Computation and machine learning for materials: Past, present, and future perspectives

Abstract Computational methods and machine learning (ML) are reshaping materials science by accelerating their discovery, design, and optimization. Traditional approaches such as density functional theory and molecular dynamics have been instrumental in studying materials at the atomic level. However, their high computational cost and, in certain cases, limited accuracy can restrict the scope of in silico exploration. ML promises to accelerate material property prediction and design. However, in many areas, the volume and fidelity of the data are critical barriers. Active learning can reduce the reliance on large data sets, and simulation has emerged as a critical tool for generating data on the fly. Despite these advances, challenges remain, particularly in data quality, model interpretability, and bridging the gap between computational predictions and experimental validation. Future research should develop automated frameworks capable of designing and testing materials for specific applications, and integrating ML with traditional simulations and experiments can contribute to this goal. Graphic abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRS Bulletin
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-025-00959-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computation and machine learning for materials: Past, present, and future perspectives

Tengfei Luo, Sobin Alosious, Meng Jiang
2 citations
MRS Bulletin
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
article

Computation and machine learning for materials: Past, present, and future perspectives

Tengfei Luo, Sobin Alosious, Meng Jiang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Computational methods and machine learning (ML) are reshaping materials science by accelerating their discovery, design, and optimization. Traditional approaches such as density functional theory and molecular dynamics have been instrumental in studying materials at the atomic level. However, their high computational cost and, in certain cases, limited accuracy can restrict the scope of in silico exploration. ML promises to accelerate material property prediction and design. However, in many areas, the volume and fidelity of the data are critical barriers. Active learning can reduce the reliance on large data sets, and simulation has emerged as a critical tool for generating data on the fly. Despite these advances, challenges remain, particularly in data quality, model interpretability, and bridging the gap between computational predictions and experimental validation. Future research should develop automated frameworks capable of designing and testing materials for specific applications, and integrating ML with traditional simulations and experiments can contribute to this goal. Graphic abstract

MRS BulletinVol. 50(10)
University of Notre Dame (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Computation and machine learning for materials: Past, present, and future perspectives — Tengfei Luo, Sobin Alosious, et al. · MRS Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS