<b>Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Profiles in Obese Women with Irregular Versus Regular Menstrual Cycles: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study from Sialkot</b>

Background: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for reproductive dysfunction, often disrupting the balance between estradiol and progesterone that regulates normal menstrual cyclicity. Elevated estradiol through aromatization in adipose tissue and inadequate luteal progesterone production may jointly contribute to irregular cycles and infertility in obese women, but comparative evidence remains limited in South Asian populations. Objective: This study aimed to investigate serum estradiol and progesterone profiles in obese women with irregular versus regular menstrual cycles and evaluate their diagnostic performance in predicting menstrual dysfunction. Methods: A hospital-based case–control study was conducted among 80 obese women aged 18–45 years, recruited from tertiary facilities in Sialkot, Pakistan. Cases were defined as women with self-reported irregular cycles (n=40), while controls had regular cycles (n=40). Clinical data, anthropometry, and fasting blood samples were obtained. Estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels were quantified, and analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, logistic regression adjusted for confounders, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Women with irregular cycles exhibited significantly higher mean estradiol (148.6 ± 117.2 vs 89.0 ± 62.1 pg/mL, p=0.005) and lower progesterone (2.3 ± 6.1 vs 6.9 ± 11.4 ng/mL, p=0.03). Low progesterone (<1 ng/mL) was more prevalent among irregular cases (60% vs 25%, RR 2.4, p=0.002). Estradiol quartile analysis showed a dose–response association with irregularity (p-trend=0.004), while higher progesterone quartiles were protective (p-trend=0.002). ROC analysis yielded AUCs of 0.77 for estradiol and 0.84 for progesterone. Conclusion: Obese women with irregular cycles demonstrate a distinct hormonal signature of estrogen excess and luteal inadequacy. Routine dual profiling of estradiol and progesterone may enhance early detection of menstrual dysfunction and guide targeted interventions to restore cycle regularity and protect reproductive health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61919/74tfer51
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Profiles in Obese Women with Irregular Versus Regular Menstrual Cycles: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study from Sialkot

Saima Ashraf, Asad Shabbir, Muhammad Awais, Ayesha Ijaz et al.
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Profiles in Obese Women with Irregular Versus Regular Menstrual Cycles: A Hospital-Based Case–Control Study from Sialkot

Saima Ashraf, Asad Shabbir, Muhammad Awais, Ayesha Ijaz, Anam Ziarat, Nadia Nazish
article en

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for reproductive dysfunction, often disrupting the balance between estradiol and progesterone that regulates normal menstrual cyclicity. Elevated estradiol through aromatization in adipose tissue and inadequate luteal progesterone production may jointly contribute to irregular cycles and infertility in obese women, but comparative evidence remains limited in South Asian populations. Objective: This study aimed to investigate serum estradiol and progesterone profiles in obese women with irregular versus regular menstrual cycles and evaluate their diagnostic performance in predicting menstrual dysfunction. Methods: A hospital-based case–control study was conducted among 80 obese women aged 18–45 years, recruited from tertiary facilities in Sialkot, Pakistan. Cases were defined as women with self-reported irregular cycles (n=40), while controls had regular cycles (n=40). Clinical data, anthropometry, and fasting blood samples were obtained. Estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels were quantified, and analyses included descriptive statistics, t-tests, logistic regression adjusted for confounders, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Women with irregular cycles exhibited significantly higher mean estradiol (148.6 ± 117.2 vs 89.0 ± 62.1 pg/mL, p=0.005) and lower progesterone (2.3 ± 6.1 vs 6.9 ± 11.4 ng/mL, p=0.03). Low progesterone (<1 ng/mL) was more prevalent among irregular cases (60% vs 25%, RR 2.4, p=0.002). Estradiol quartile analysis showed a dose–response association with irregularity (p-trend=0.004), while higher progesterone quartiles were protective (p-trend=0.002). ROC analysis yielded AUCs of 0.77 for estradiol and 0.84 for progesterone. Conclusion: Obese women with irregular cycles demonstrate a distinct hormonal signature of estrogen excess and luteal inadequacy. Routine dual profiling of estradiol and progesterone may enhance early detection of menstrual dysfunction and guide targeted interventions to restore cycle regularity and protect reproductive health.

Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
University of Sialkot
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.