What makes a political theory cross-cultural?

Elena Ziliotti’s book Meritocratic Democracy: A Cross-Cultural Political Theory offers an argument for meritocratic democracy by putting two bodies of scholarship in conversation with each other: Western democratic theory and contemporary Confucian political theory. In this essay, I probe the extent to which the proposed theory is cross-cultural. More specifically, I ask what is distinctively Confucian about the political ideals underpinning Ziliotti’s account and whether the argument ultimately rests on institutional, rather than cultural, foundations. I also consider whether the argument could have been extended to include developing countries, thereby widening the scope of the theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2025.2558330
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What makes a political theory cross-cultural?

Loubna El Amine
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Chinese history and philosophy
article

What makes a political theory cross-cultural?

Loubna El Amine
article en

Abstract

Elena Ziliotti’s book Meritocratic Democracy: A Cross-Cultural Political Theory offers an argument for meritocratic democracy by putting two bodies of scholarship in conversation with each other: Western democratic theory and contemporary Confucian political theory. In this essay, I probe the extent to which the proposed theory is cross-cultural. More specifically, I ask what is distinctively Confucian about the political ideals underpinning Ziliotti’s account and whether the argument ultimately rests on institutional, rather than cultural, foundations. I also consider whether the argument could have been extended to include developing countries, thereby widening the scope of the theory.

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.