Psychometric inspection of an internalized homonegativity measure

Internalized homonegativity (IH) is a substantively important construct linked to various health-related quality-of-life indicators. Despite IH's prominence in the homosexuality literature, however, several measurement challenges are posed to advancing its empirical evidence base. This study aimed to bring modern psychometric methods to bear on a measure of IH in a general population sample of self-reported gay, lesbian, and bisexual respondents in Switzerland (<i>n</i> = 988). Specifically, we used a prospective observational cross-sectional design with questionnaire methodology to examine three aspects of the validity of a 7-item IH instrument: (1) structure validity, (2) cross-linguistic validity, and (3) "known-groups" (discriminant) validity. Our findings indicated support for the 7-item IH measure's essential unidimensionality. Furthermore, we found support for IH's measurement equivalence across German- and French-speaking regions, whereas mixed support was found for its extension to bisexual respondents. Finally, the IH measure exhibited discriminant validity, such that depression and poor self-reported health status were associated with higher IH scores. In conclusion, the IH instrument may be used as a unidimensional measure across German- and French-speaking general populations; however, further research should focus on extending its linguistic validity and measurement equivalence to bisexual and transgender populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569382
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric inspection of an internalized homonegativity measure

Matthew J. Kerry, Paula Krüger, Andreas Pfister
Frontiers in Psychology
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Psychometric inspection of an internalized homonegativity measure

Matthew J. Kerry, Paula Krüger, Andreas Pfister
article en

Abstract

Internalized homonegativity (IH) is a substantively important construct linked to various health-related quality-of-life indicators. Despite IH's prominence in the homosexuality literature, however, several measurement challenges are posed to advancing its empirical evidence base. This study aimed to bring modern psychometric methods to bear on a measure of IH in a general population sample of self-reported gay, lesbian, and bisexual respondents in Switzerland (<i>n</i> = 988). Specifically, we used a prospective observational cross-sectional design with questionnaire methodology to examine three aspects of the validity of a 7-item IH instrument: (1) structure validity, (2) cross-linguistic validity, and (3) "known-groups" (discriminant) validity. Our findings indicated support for the 7-item IH measure's essential unidimensionality. Furthermore, we found support for IH's measurement equivalence across German- and French-speaking regions, whereas mixed support was found for its extension to bisexual respondents. Finally, the IH measure exhibited discriminant validity, such that depression and poor self-reported health status were associated with higher IH scores. In conclusion, the IH instrument may be used as a unidimensional measure across German- and French-speaking general populations; however, further research should focus on extending its linguistic validity and measurement equivalence to bisexual and transgender populations.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.