The Webiomed.DHRA decision-making support system for medical examinations in the Russian Federation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective. Cost-effectiveness analysis of decision-making support system with artificial intelligence automating risk assessment using the SCORE scale in preventive medical examinations. Material and methods. An original mathematical model was created to simulate 10-year survival of patients with various cardiovascular risks assessed by the SCORE system. Two scenarios were compared: (1) risk assessment by a physician with decision-making support system, and (2) risk assessment without decision-making support. The primary effectiveness outcome was life-years gained per a patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to assess economic feasibility. Analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective. We considered the following costs: implementation of decision-making support system, physician visits (screening, diagnosis, treatment assignment, follow-up), and pharmacotherapy for patients entitled to medication benefits. The target population was adults aged 40—65 without CVD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease. Clinical efficacy in the model corresponded to efficacy of the Webiomed.DHRA decision-making support system that was expressed in accuracy of determining the CVR (“correctness”) according to the SCORE scale. Results. The modeled 10-year mortality was 1.25% in scenario 1 and 3.70% in scenario 2 (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.27—0.40). Thus, there was significantly lower mortality in case of decision-making support system. Mean undiscounted annual cost per patient was RUB 7.947.97 (discounted: RUB 6.530) and RUB 4.444 (discounted: RUB 3.683), respectively. The ICER was RUB 276.905 per life-year gained without discounting and RUB 224.983 with discounting. This value is lower than cost-effectiveness threshold for 2024. The majority of costs (87.61%) were attributed to medical visits, while implementation of decision-making support system accounted for only 0.051%. Conclusion. Introduction of decision-making support system with artificial intelligence for assessing cardiovascular risks into regional healthcare system will reduce mortality over the next 10 years after medical examination. According to cost-effectiveness analysis, this system is economically acceptable medical technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Technologies Assessment and Choice
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/medtech20254703161
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Webiomed.DHRA decision-making support system for medical examinations in the Russian Federation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

F. V. Gorkavenko, Yu. V. Seryapina, V. V. Оmelyanovskiy, D. Yu. Morozov
Medical Technologies Assessment and Choice
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

The Webiomed.DHRA decision-making support system for medical examinations in the Russian Federation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

F. V. Gorkavenko, Yu. V. Seryapina, V. V. Оmelyanovskiy, D. Yu. Morozov
article en

Abstract

Objective. Cost-effectiveness analysis of decision-making support system with artificial intelligence automating risk assessment using the SCORE scale in preventive medical examinations. Material and methods. An original mathematical model was created to simulate 10-year survival of patients with various cardiovascular risks assessed by the SCORE system. Two scenarios were compared: (1) risk assessment by a physician with decision-making support system, and (2) risk assessment without decision-making support. The primary effectiveness outcome was life-years gained per a patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to assess economic feasibility. Analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective. We considered the following costs: implementation of decision-making support system, physician visits (screening, diagnosis, treatment assignment, follow-up), and pharmacotherapy for patients entitled to medication benefits. The target population was adults aged 40—65 without CVD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease. Clinical efficacy in the model corresponded to efficacy of the Webiomed.DHRA decision-making support system that was expressed in accuracy of determining the CVR (“correctness”) according to the SCORE scale. Results. The modeled 10-year mortality was 1.25% in scenario 1 and 3.70% in scenario 2 (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.27—0.40). Thus, there was significantly lower mortality in case of decision-making support system. Mean undiscounted annual cost per patient was RUB 7.947.97 (discounted: RUB 6.530) and RUB 4.444 (discounted: RUB 3.683), respectively. The ICER was RUB 276.905 per life-year gained without discounting and RUB 224.983 with discounting. This value is lower than cost-effectiveness threshold for 2024. The majority of costs (87.61%) were attributed to medical visits, while implementation of decision-making support system accounted for only 0.051%. Conclusion. Introduction of decision-making support system with artificial intelligence for assessing cardiovascular risks into regional healthcare system will reduce mortality over the next 10 years after medical examination. According to cost-effectiveness analysis, this system is economically acceptable medical technology.

Medical Technologies Assessment and ChoiceVol. 47(3)
Sechenov University (RU), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Federal State Budgetary Institution "Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care" (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.