The Evolution of Research Methodology for Chinese Politics in Taiwanese Academia: A Historical Review

This study examines the 70-year transformation of China studies in Taiwan's political science, from the ideological “bandit situation studies” (feiqing yanjiu) to a diversified, scientific academic field. Early Cold War-era research, characterized by anti-communist strategic analysis, shifted toward scientific “CCP studies” (Zhonggong yanjiu) following Taiwan's diplomatic setbacks in the 1970s. Since the 1990s, democratization and cross-strait exchanges have spurred methodological pluralism, incorporating advanced theoretical approaches such as new institutionalism and constructivism. The article argues that this evolution is not merely a methodological progression but an intellectual struggle reflecting Taiwan's changing political identity and the reconfiguration of its relationship with China. Ultimately, Taiwan's unique geopolitical context, where understanding China is an existential imperative, serves as the primary driver for its uniquely dynamic and innovative contribution to global China studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sungshin Women s University Center for East Asian Studies
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56022/ceas.2025.31.2.41
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Research Methodology for Chinese Politics in Taiwanese Academia: A Historical Review

Sang-Min Seo
Sungshin Women s University Center for East Asian Studies
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

The Evolution of Research Methodology for Chinese Politics in Taiwanese Academia: A Historical Review

Sang-Min Seo
article en

Abstract

This study examines the 70-year transformation of China studies in Taiwan's political science, from the ideological “bandit situation studies” (feiqing yanjiu) to a diversified, scientific academic field. Early Cold War-era research, characterized by anti-communist strategic analysis, shifted toward scientific “CCP studies” (Zhonggong yanjiu) following Taiwan's diplomatic setbacks in the 1970s. Since the 1990s, democratization and cross-strait exchanges have spurred methodological pluralism, incorporating advanced theoretical approaches such as new institutionalism and constructivism. The article argues that this evolution is not merely a methodological progression but an intellectual struggle reflecting Taiwan's changing political identity and the reconfiguration of its relationship with China. Ultimately, Taiwan's unique geopolitical context, where understanding China is an existential imperative, serves as the primary driver for its uniquely dynamic and innovative contribution to global China studies.

Sungshin Women s University Center for East Asian StudiesVol. 31(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.