Cycles of inequality in the marketplace: Insights from macro, marketer, and consumer perspectives

Seeking inequality via differentiation is a fundamental theme in the marketing literature: consumers derive utility from products that convey socially valued attributes, and marketers target consumers by giving them opportunities to differentiate on socially valued attributes. However, as a large body of evidence shows, inequality can reduce consumer well-being and limit economic growth. In this paper, we take a systemic view of marketplace inequality, examining the interdependence among consumers, marketers, and macro forces in shaping inequality in markets for goods and services. Our broad review of the marketing literature across ten marketing journals and a variety of subdomains within the field (e.g., macromarketing, consumer behavior, marketing strategy, quantitative marketing) suggests that macro forces, marketers, and consumers are all part of a dynamic system in which each contributes to creating, perpetuating, and disrupting cycles of marketplace inequality. By highlighting the process by which inequality can be created, perpetuated, and reduced, we hope to give marketing researchers and practitioners insight into interventions that have the potential to increase consumer well-being and marketer profitability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.09.004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycles of inequality in the marketplace: Insights from macro, marketer, and consumer perspectives

Daniel Fernandes, Guillaume D. Johnson, Debora V. Thompson, Amna Kirmani et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Research in Marketing
Economic Theory and Institutions
3.13
article

Cycles of inequality in the marketplace: Insights from macro, marketer, and consumer perspectives

Daniel Fernandes, Guillaume D. Johnson, Debora V. Thompson, Amna Kirmani, Francine Espinoza Petersen, Andrew A. Li, Christilene du Plessis, Lisa K. Scheer, Rebecca Hamilton, Jian Ni, Brent McFerran, Keith Wilcox, В. Н. Павлов, Yan Vieites
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Seeking inequality via differentiation is a fundamental theme in the marketing literature: consumers derive utility from products that convey socially valued attributes, and marketers target consumers by giving them opportunities to differentiate on socially valued attributes. However, as a large body of evidence shows, inequality can reduce consumer well-being and limit economic growth. In this paper, we take a systemic view of marketplace inequality, examining the interdependence among consumers, marketers, and macro forces in shaping inequality in markets for goods and services. Our broad review of the marketing literature across ten marketing journals and a variety of subdomains within the field (e.g., macromarketing, consumer behavior, marketing strategy, quantitative marketing) suggests that macro forces, marketers, and consumers are all part of a dynamic system in which each contributes to creating, perpetuating, and disrupting cycles of marketplace inequality. By highlighting the process by which inequality can be created, perpetuated, and reduced, we hope to give marketing researchers and practitioners insight into interventions that have the potential to increase consumer well-being and marketer profitability.

International Journal of Research in Marketing
Simon Fraser University (CA), Georgetown University (US), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Mitchell Institute (US), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR), University College London (GB), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Missouri (US), Singapore Management University (SG), Virginia Tech (US), Texas A&M University (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic Theory and Institutions
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.