The Inter-comparison of GOSAT, GOSAT-2 and OCO-2/3 XCO2 Measurements over East Asia and Validated with TCCON Observations

Satellite remote sensing provides an essential tool for monitoring atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) mole fraction. Currently, there are several satellite missions providing global column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO2 (XCO2) observations. Assessing the spatial coverage, temporal trends, accuracy and precision of these satellite products is critical for carbon cycle studies and informing climate policy. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the differences in XCO2 products among GOSAT, GOSAT-2, OCO-2, and OCO-3 over East Asia between August 2019 and November 2023. In addition, the satellite data are also validated with the ground-based TCCON measurements. It is found that GOSAT-2, whose the XCO2 is not bias-corrected, has the largest systematic biases of 3.27-5.81 ppm, with random uncertainties of 3.45-6.04 ppm at six TCCON sites. OCO-2 and OCO-3 show a good agreement, and their co-located differences are generally within ~1.5 ppm. The annual growth rates of XCO2 derived from the four satellite products are 1.23±0.31–2.75±0.34 ppm/year, while TCCON-derived values are 2.21±0.03–2.54±0.03 ppm/year. The amplitudes and phases of the XCO2 seasonal variation derived from the four satellite products also differ from those of TCCON, mainly due to the less frequent sampling of satellite XCO2 products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.175745370.03256387/v1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Inter-comparison of GOSAT, GOSAT-2 and OCO-2/3 XCO2 Measurements over East Asia and Validated with TCCON Observations

Voltaire A. Velazco, Hirofumi Ohyama, Isamu Morino, Wei Wang et al.
1 citations
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
article

The Inter-comparison of GOSAT, GOSAT-2 and OCO-2/3 XCO2 Measurements over East Asia and Validated with TCCON Observations

Voltaire A. Velazco, Hirofumi Ohyama, Isamu Morino, Wei Wang, Yang Yang, M. Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Satellite remote sensing provides an essential tool for monitoring atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) mole fraction. Currently, there are several satellite missions providing global column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of CO2 (XCO2) observations. Assessing the spatial coverage, temporal trends, accuracy and precision of these satellite products is critical for carbon cycle studies and informing climate policy. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the differences in XCO2 products among GOSAT, GOSAT-2, OCO-2, and OCO-3 over East Asia between August 2019 and November 2023. In addition, the satellite data are also validated with the ground-based TCCON measurements. It is found that GOSAT-2, whose the XCO2 is not bias-corrected, has the largest systematic biases of 3.27-5.81 ppm, with random uncertainties of 3.45-6.04 ppm at six TCCON sites. OCO-2 and OCO-3 show a good agreement, and their co-located differences are generally within ~1.5 ppm. The annual growth rates of XCO2 derived from the four satellite products are 1.23±0.31–2.75±0.34 ppm/year, while TCCON-derived values are 2.21±0.03–2.54±0.03 ppm/year. The amplitudes and phases of the XCO2 seasonal variation derived from the four satellite products also differ from those of TCCON, mainly due to the less frequent sampling of satellite XCO2 products.

Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (CN), Jiaxing University (CN), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CZ), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.