Modular post-hoc enhancements for zero-shot histopathology classification using vision-language models

Abstract Zero-shot learning with vision-language models (VLMs) has shown promising results in histopathological image classification. However, existing approaches often under-utilize domain-specific adaptations that could enhance performance in specialized medical tasks. In this study, we systematically evaluate three modular, post-hoc enhancements to standard zero-shot VLM pipelines: (1) cosine similarity calibration for affinity matrix construction, (2) prompt template enhancement via diverse clinical prompts, and (3) adaptive hyperparameter tuning using a Gaussian mixture model-based method for adjusting pseudo-labeling weights ( λ ) and support set contributions ( γ ), following Zanella et al We conduct extensive zero-shot experiments on the NCT-CRC-HE-100 K dataset, using 60 000 patches for validation of inference-time hyperparameters and reserving 40 000 patches as an independent test set. No training or fine-tuning was performed. The evaluation was carried out across five VLMs: CLIP, CONCH, PLIP, Quilt-B16, and Quilt-B32. Results show that each enhancement module yields significant accuracy gains. Cosine calibration improves CLIP (+7.8%), CONCH (+1.53%), PLIP (+14.3%), Quilt-B16 (+16.1%), and Quilt-B32 (+11.4%). Prompt enhancement yields accuracy gains in PLIP (+16.8%) and Quilt-B32 (+29.9%), with limited effect on CLIP or CONCH. Adaptive tuning yields large improvements in PLIP (+28.4%). The best performance is achieved with the full combination of enhancements, with PLIP reaching 87.88% (+27.88%, p < 0.001) and Quilt-B32 reaching 88.38% (+36.1%) over their baselines. CLIP showed significance only with cosine calibration ( p < 0.001), reflecting its contrastive learning backbone. Although CONCH reached the highest raw accuracy (92.63%) under the full enhancement setting, this performance appears primarily driven by its histopathology-specific pretraining; statistically significant gains emerged only in cosine-based combinations, indicating limited responsiveness to prompt or tuning. Our findings highlight the critical role of structured modular enhancements in optimizing VLM performance for specialized clinical domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ae0557
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modular post-hoc enhancements for zero-shot histopathology classification using vision-language models

Mustafa Elattar, Mayar Tarek Henedak, Shahd M. Noman
Machine Learning Science and Technology
AI in cancer detection
article

Modular post-hoc enhancements for zero-shot histopathology classification using vision-language models

Mustafa Elattar, Mayar Tarek Henedak, Shahd M. Noman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Zero-shot learning with vision-language models (VLMs) has shown promising results in histopathological image classification. However, existing approaches often under-utilize domain-specific adaptations that could enhance performance in specialized medical tasks. In this study, we systematically evaluate three modular, post-hoc enhancements to standard zero-shot VLM pipelines: (1) cosine similarity calibration for affinity matrix construction, (2) prompt template enhancement via diverse clinical prompts, and (3) adaptive hyperparameter tuning using a Gaussian mixture model-based method for adjusting pseudo-labeling weights ( λ ) and support set contributions ( γ ), following Zanella et al We conduct extensive zero-shot experiments on the NCT-CRC-HE-100 K dataset, using 60 000 patches for validation of inference-time hyperparameters and reserving 40 000 patches as an independent test set. No training or fine-tuning was performed. The evaluation was carried out across five VLMs: CLIP, CONCH, PLIP, Quilt-B16, and Quilt-B32. Results show that each enhancement module yields significant accuracy gains. Cosine calibration improves CLIP (+7.8%), CONCH (+1.53%), PLIP (+14.3%), Quilt-B16 (+16.1%), and Quilt-B32 (+11.4%). Prompt enhancement yields accuracy gains in PLIP (+16.8%) and Quilt-B32 (+29.9%), with limited effect on CLIP or CONCH. Adaptive tuning yields large improvements in PLIP (+28.4%). The best performance is achieved with the full combination of enhancements, with PLIP reaching 87.88% (+27.88%, p < 0.001) and Quilt-B32 reaching 88.38% (+36.1%) over their baselines. CLIP showed significance only with cosine calibration ( p < 0.001), reflecting its contrastive learning backbone. Although CONCH reached the highest raw accuracy (92.63%) under the full enhancement setting, this performance appears primarily driven by its histopathology-specific pretraining; statistically significant gains emerged only in cosine-based combinations, indicating limited responsiveness to prompt or tuning. Our findings highlight the critical role of structured modular enhancements in optimizing VLM performance for specialized clinical domains.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 6(3)
Nile University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.