A Knowledge-Recommendation Approach to Enhance Cognitive Efficacy in Engineering Design

The complexity and rapid updates of technical specification knowledge pose efficiency challenges for designers in extracting design specification knowledge. To address this issue, a knowledge recommendation method for engineering design based on user requirements and technical specification mapping is proposed. By analyzing the design specification text, the algorithm for extracting design knowledge identifies four types of knowledge: enumeration explanation, comparative relationship, conditional rule, and explanatory explanation. Additionally, a method is introduced to decompose natural language-expressed requirements into requirement units in engineering design. The development of a Neo4j-based algorithm has been undertaken to construct a visually represented knowledge graph for technical specifications. Taking the example of wind turbine related specification text in wind power generation field, a deep learning algorithm based on the BERT large language model is employed to align these findings with decomposed user requirements and provides designers with relevant technical specification knowledge. Ultimately, the proposed method demonstrates accurate recommendations of technical specification knowledge through validation with diverse user requirement cases. The average accuracy of the four types of rules is 99.66%, the average recall rate is 98.75%, and the average F1-score is 99.19%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciea65512.2025.11148453
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Knowledge-Recommendation Approach to Enhance Cognitive Efficacy in Engineering Design

Shanghua Mi, Guoliang Fan, Guandong Gao, M. Song et al.
Design Education and Practice
article

A Knowledge-Recommendation Approach to Enhance Cognitive Efficacy in Engineering Design

Shanghua Mi, Guoliang Fan, Guandong Gao, M. Song, Chaoqun Xiao, Hao Zheng
article en

Abstract

The complexity and rapid updates of technical specification knowledge pose efficiency challenges for designers in extracting design specification knowledge. To address this issue, a knowledge recommendation method for engineering design based on user requirements and technical specification mapping is proposed. By analyzing the design specification text, the algorithm for extracting design knowledge identifies four types of knowledge: enumeration explanation, comparative relationship, conditional rule, and explanatory explanation. Additionally, a method is introduced to decompose natural language-expressed requirements into requirement units in engineering design. The development of a Neo4j-based algorithm has been undertaken to construct a visually represented knowledge graph for technical specifications. Taking the example of wind turbine related specification text in wind power generation field, a deep learning algorithm based on the BERT large language model is employed to align these findings with decomposed user requirements and provides designers with relevant technical specification knowledge. Ultimately, the proposed method demonstrates accurate recommendations of technical specification knowledge through validation with diverse user requirement cases. The average accuracy of the four types of rules is 99.66%, the average recall rate is 98.75%, and the average F1-score is 99.19%.

PowerChina (China) (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.