Cross-Cultural Nuances of Micro-Expressions and Action Units: A Comparative Study

This study explores the interplay between cultural norms, expressive traits, and computational modeling in the analysis of micro-expressions (ME) and facial action units (AUs) across Asian and Caucasian groups. We first investigate the differences in expressive occurrences, including their frequency, intensity, and duration of the two ethnic groups, and then evaluate the representative computational models on their vulnerability of being impacted by the cross-cultural domain shift.One of our hypotheses is that AU detection models are less affected by the cross-cultural domain shift than the ME recognition models, as the AUs are more rigorously defined according to anatomics by the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Experimental results on 4DME, SMIC, and BP4D datasets are supportive of the hypothesis. Future research should work towards building ethnically balanced datasets and developing culturally adaptive models, especially for ME recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icmew68306.2025.11152056
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Cultural Nuances of Micro-Expressions and Action Units: A Comparative Study

Xinglong Mao, Sirui Zhao, Jingjing Chen, Hao Zou et al.
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Cross-Cultural Nuances of Micro-Expressions and Action Units: A Comparative Study

Xinglong Mao, Sirui Zhao, Jingjing Chen, Hao Zou, Xiaobai Li
article en

Abstract

This study explores the interplay between cultural norms, expressive traits, and computational modeling in the analysis of micro-expressions (ME) and facial action units (AUs) across Asian and Caucasian groups. We first investigate the differences in expressive occurrences, including their frequency, intensity, and duration of the two ethnic groups, and then evaluate the representative computational models on their vulnerability of being impacted by the cross-cultural domain shift.One of our hypotheses is that AU detection models are less affected by the cross-cultural domain shift than the ME recognition models, as the AUs are more rigorously defined according to anatomics by the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Experimental results on 4DME, SMIC, and BP4D datasets are supportive of the hypothesis. Future research should work towards building ethnically balanced datasets and developing culturally adaptive models, especially for ME recognition.

University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-Cultural Nuances of Micro-Expressions and Action Units: A Comparative Study — Xinglong Mao, Sirui Zhao, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS