Implementation and Comparison of CNN Models on CIFAR-10 Dataset

This study investigates the vulnerability of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to adversarial attacks, focusing on the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM). We implemented and compared CNN models with different depths, including ResNet8, ResNet18, ResNet34, and ResNet50, on the CIFAR-10 dataset. Our results show that while deeper networks achieved higher accuracy on clean data, they exhibited significantly lower robustness under FGSM perturbations. In contrast, shallower models maintained relatively better performance under adversarial conditions despite lower clean accuracy. For example, ResNet34 achieved 82.2% accuracy on clean data but dropped to 2.5% under attack, whereas ResNet8 maintained 25.8% accuracy under attack. These findings highlight a trade-off between model depth and adversarial robustness. The study suggests that improving the robustness of deep learning models against adversarial examples is essential for their safe deployment in real-world applications. Future work should focus on integrating robust defense techniques such as adversarial training, defensive distillation, and regularization strategies to enhance model security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciea65512.2025.11148839
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and Comparison of CNN Models on CIFAR-10 Dataset

Jeong‐Won Kim, Dongho Shin, Seung-Hwan Shin
1 citations
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
article

Implementation and Comparison of CNN Models on CIFAR-10 Dataset

Jeong‐Won Kim, Dongho Shin, Seung-Hwan Shin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the vulnerability of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to adversarial attacks, focusing on the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM). We implemented and compared CNN models with different depths, including ResNet8, ResNet18, ResNet34, and ResNet50, on the CIFAR-10 dataset. Our results show that while deeper networks achieved higher accuracy on clean data, they exhibited significantly lower robustness under FGSM perturbations. In contrast, shallower models maintained relatively better performance under adversarial conditions despite lower clean accuracy. For example, ResNet34 achieved 82.2% accuracy on clean data but dropped to 2.5% under attack, whereas ResNet8 maintained 25.8% accuracy under attack. These findings highlight a trade-off between model depth and adversarial robustness. The study suggests that improving the robustness of deep learning models against adversarial examples is essential for their safe deployment in real-world applications. Future work should focus on integrating robust defense techniques such as adversarial training, defensive distillation, and regularization strategies to enhance model security.

Nihon University (JP), Shinhan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.