Technique sensitivity hampers outcomes in periodontal regeneration when performed by less experienced operators: A retrospective analysis

Flap design is a key factor in the clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration (PR). This study compares the effectiveness of minimally invasive flap (MIF) to conventional flap (CF) techniques in PR procedures performed by periodontic residents. The study also addresses how technique sensitivity may influence clinical outcomes when performed by less experienced operators. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent PR from January 2012 to January 2023 at the School of Dentistry, University of Michigan. Flap techniques were classified as MIF or CF, and clinical outcomes, including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), changes in keratinized gingiva, and tooth loss, were evaluated. Statistical analysis using generalized estimation equations was performed for the overall sample and separately for each group. The study sample consisted of 40 male (45.5%) and 48 female patients (54.5%), with an average age of 63.1 ± 13.8 years and a mean follow-up of 42 months. No significant differences were found between the MIF and CF groups regarding the reduction in PD or GR. However, the CF group exhibited a superior gain in CAL (p=0.005) and a greater decrease in BOP after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio: 4.44, p=0.0276). Tooth type and defect depth were identified as significant factors affecting clinical outcomes. Both techniques were effective in treating periodontal defects. However, the CF approach demonstrated a greater improvement in CAL and BOP. Given the technique-sensitive nature of MIF, the limited clinical experience of resident operators may have contributed to the diminished performance of MIF observed in this study. Simpler surgical techniques may offer comparable effectiveness to more complex, superior surgical techniques in a university-based setting when performed by less experienced operators.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Translational Medicine
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm025080015
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technique sensitivity hampers outcomes in periodontal regeneration when performed by less experienced operators: A retrospective analysis

Abdusalam Alrmali, Hom‐Lay Wang, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Yousef Taha Y. Amrou et al.
Global Translational Medicine
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Technique sensitivity hampers outcomes in periodontal regeneration when performed by less experienced operators: A retrospective analysis

Abdusalam Alrmali, Hom‐Lay Wang, Muhammad H. A. Saleh, Yousef Taha Y. Amrou, Hamzeh Almashni, Ruben Leyton
article en

Abstract

Flap design is a key factor in the clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration (PR). This study compares the effectiveness of minimally invasive flap (MIF) to conventional flap (CF) techniques in PR procedures performed by periodontic residents. The study also addresses how technique sensitivity may influence clinical outcomes when performed by less experienced operators. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent PR from January 2012 to January 2023 at the School of Dentistry, University of Michigan. Flap techniques were classified as MIF or CF, and clinical outcomes, including bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), changes in keratinized gingiva, and tooth loss, were evaluated. Statistical analysis using generalized estimation equations was performed for the overall sample and separately for each group. The study sample consisted of 40 male (45.5%) and 48 female patients (54.5%), with an average age of 63.1 ± 13.8 years and a mean follow-up of 42 months. No significant differences were found between the MIF and CF groups regarding the reduction in PD or GR. However, the CF group exhibited a superior gain in CAL (p=0.005) and a greater decrease in BOP after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio: 4.44, p=0.0276). Tooth type and defect depth were identified as significant factors affecting clinical outcomes. Both techniques were effective in treating periodontal defects. However, the CF approach demonstrated a greater improvement in CAL and BOP. Given the technique-sensitive nature of MIF, the limited clinical experience of resident operators may have contributed to the diminished performance of MIF observed in this study. Simpler surgical techniques may offer comparable effectiveness to more complex, superior surgical techniques in a university-based setting when performed by less experienced operators.

Global Translational MedicineVol. 0(0)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.