“If all of this was about health, I’d still be working:” Lived experiences of healthcare workers under COVID-19 vaccine mandates in British Columbia, Canada

COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers (HCWs) in British Columbia (BC) were implemented in October 2021 and remained effective until July 2024, despite public protests and opposition from some unions. This study explored HCWs’ lived experiences under these mandates, focusing on decision-making processes, personal and professional impacts, and perceived consequences for patient care. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative responses from 90 HCWs, collected through one open-ended survey question and elaborations on closed questions. The survey, conducted in May–June 2024, recruited a convenience sample of 166 HCWs of varying vaccination status, professions, and demographics through social media and professional networks. Findings are reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist (Table A1). Most respondents were unvaccinated and had lost employment due to non-compliance. Participants reported significant personal losses and expressed overwhelmingly negative views on mandates. Six key themes emerged: (1) conflict with scientific evidence and clinical practice; (2) violations of medical ethics, especially informed consent; (3) dismissed personal and economic hardships; (4) overlooked vaccine-related physical harms; (5) discrimination against unvaccinated HCWs and patients; and (6) negative impacts on care delivery. Our findings suggest that vaccine mandates caused substantial social and economic harm, contributed to staffing shortages, degraded workplace morale, and compromised patient care. Drawing on respondents’ experiences and the scientific evidence available at the time, we conclude that mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for HCWs lacked scientific justification and violated foundational ethical principles in health-care policy and practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Health Economics and Sustainability
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes025240043
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“If all of this was about health, I’d still be working:” Lived experiences of healthcare workers under COVID-19 vaccine mandates in British Columbia, Canada

Claudia Chaufan, Natalie Hemsing, Rachael Moncrieffe
Global Health Economics and Sustainability
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

“If all of this was about health, I’d still be working:” Lived experiences of healthcare workers under COVID-19 vaccine mandates in British Columbia, Canada

Claudia Chaufan, Natalie Hemsing, Rachael Moncrieffe
article en

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers (HCWs) in British Columbia (BC) were implemented in October 2021 and remained effective until July 2024, despite public protests and opposition from some unions. This study explored HCWs’ lived experiences under these mandates, focusing on decision-making processes, personal and professional impacts, and perceived consequences for patient care. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative responses from 90 HCWs, collected through one open-ended survey question and elaborations on closed questions. The survey, conducted in May–June 2024, recruited a convenience sample of 166 HCWs of varying vaccination status, professions, and demographics through social media and professional networks. Findings are reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist (Table A1). Most respondents were unvaccinated and had lost employment due to non-compliance. Participants reported significant personal losses and expressed overwhelmingly negative views on mandates. Six key themes emerged: (1) conflict with scientific evidence and clinical practice; (2) violations of medical ethics, especially informed consent; (3) dismissed personal and economic hardships; (4) overlooked vaccine-related physical harms; (5) discrimination against unvaccinated HCWs and patients; and (6) negative impacts on care delivery. Our findings suggest that vaccine mandates caused substantial social and economic harm, contributed to staffing shortages, degraded workplace morale, and compromised patient care. Drawing on respondents’ experiences and the scientific evidence available at the time, we conclude that mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for HCWs lacked scientific justification and violated foundational ethical principles in health-care policy and practice.

Global Health Economics and SustainabilityVol. 3(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.