Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Non-Seismically Designed Buildings in Moderate Earthquake Zone

This study evaluates the seismic vulnerability of non-seismically designed buildings in moderate earthquake located in Sabah, Borneo, East Malaysia using the FEMA P-154 Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) methodology and EMS-98 damage descriptions. The buildings, primarily constructed between the 1970s and early 2000s, were designed to support gravity and wind loads rather than seismic forces. Although it is on the tectonically stable southern Eurasia plate, the region experienced significant building damage during a magnitude Mw 6 earthquake in 2015 due to local faults. Field assessments of 215 buildings collected data on characteristics such as number of stories, construction year, occupancy, soil type, geological hazards, pounding, structural irregularities, and exterior falling hazards. Damage levels were categorized by structural type, including concrete moment-resisting frames (C1), concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infills (C3), and light wood frames (W1). The results indicate that in Ranau, 4%, 20%, 9%, and 68% of buildings were categorized as Levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 damage categories, respectively. In Lahad Datu, 62% and 38% were classified as Levels 3 and 4. Vertical irregularities, such as short columns in Ranau and split-level configurations in Lahad Datu, along with horizontal irregularities such as reentrant corners and misaligned beam-column connections, contributed significantly to structural vulnerability. These findings highlight the critical influence of architectural design on the reduction of seismic risk in moderate seismic regions and the need to improve design strategies for earthquake resilience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2025.130504
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Non-Seismically Designed Buildings in Moderate Earthquake Zone

M I Adiyanto, Samnursidah Samir, Reni Suryanita, Nur Izzati Husna Hassan et al.
1 citations
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
0.95
article

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Non-Seismically Designed Buildings in Moderate Earthquake Zone

M I Adiyanto, Samnursidah Samir, Reni Suryanita, Nur Izzati Husna Hassan, Noor Sheena Herayani Harith, Sheikh Mohd Iqbal S. Zainal Abidin, Shahrum Abdullah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic vulnerability of non-seismically designed buildings in moderate earthquake located in Sabah, Borneo, East Malaysia using the FEMA P-154 Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) methodology and EMS-98 damage descriptions. The buildings, primarily constructed between the 1970s and early 2000s, were designed to support gravity and wind loads rather than seismic forces. Although it is on the tectonically stable southern Eurasia plate, the region experienced significant building damage during a magnitude Mw 6 earthquake in 2015 due to local faults. Field assessments of 215 buildings collected data on characteristics such as number of stories, construction year, occupancy, soil type, geological hazards, pounding, structural irregularities, and exterior falling hazards. Damage levels were categorized by structural type, including concrete moment-resisting frames (C1), concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infills (C3), and light wood frames (W1). The results indicate that in Ranau, 4%, 20%, 9%, and 68% of buildings were categorized as Levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 damage categories, respectively. In Lahad Datu, 62% and 38% were classified as Levels 3 and 4. Vertical irregularities, such as short columns in Ranau and split-level configurations in Lahad Datu, along with horizontal irregularities such as reentrant corners and misaligned beam-column connections, contributed significantly to structural vulnerability. These findings highlight the critical influence of architectural design on the reduction of seismic risk in moderate seismic regions and the need to improve design strategies for earthquake resilience.

Civil Engineering and ArchitectureVol. 13(5)
Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Non-Seismically Designed Buildings in Moderate Earthquake Zone — M I Adiyanto, Samnursidah Samir, et al. · Civil Engineering and Architecture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS