Comparison of Traffic Volume Estimates from Greenshield Modeling Using Google Traffic Data and Field Survey Results in Palembang City, Indonesia

Traffic volume serves as a critical metric for assessing the efficiency and planning of urban road infrastructure. Traditionally, traffic volume data is collected through field surveys, a process that demands substantial time, resources, and financial investment. As an alternative, the utilization of secondary data sources, such as Google Traffic data, offers a more efficient and cost-effective method for estimating traffic volume with improved accuracy. This study applies Greenshield's modelling to estimate traffic volume. The primary objective of this research is to validate the traffic volume estimation derived from Greenshield's model, using speed data obtained via an API, by comparing it with field-observed traffic survey data in Palembang City, Indonesia. The data retrieved from the Google Traffic server via the Application Programming Interface (API) consists of real-time travel times recorded at 15-minute intervals for a fixed-distance road segment. The real-time speed of a given road segment is computed directly based on the ratio of distance to travel time when data retrieval. The free-flow speed (<img src=image/14841715_01.gif>) is determined under uncongested traffic conditions and is represented by the average speed recorded between 22:00 and 05:00. Meanwhile, the average speed (<img src=image/14841715_02.gif>) corresponds to the traffic conditions observed during specific time periods that align with field survey observations, namely morning (06:00–08:00), afternoon (12:30–14:30), and evening (16:00–18:00). Additionally, the maximum vehicle density (<img src=image/14841715_03.gif>) during congestion is assumed to be 200 pcu/km for each lane. Subsequently, the model integrates the accumulated values of traffic density (<img src=image/14841715_04.gif>) and average vehicle speed (<img src=image/14841715_02.gif>) to determine the traffic volume using an hourly traffic flow (<img src=image/14841715_05.gif>) approach on the road. This study showed a strong correlation existed between traffic volume estimated using Greenshield modeling with Google Traffic speed data and traffic volume data collected from the field survey. The coefficient of determination (<img src=image/14841715_06.gif>) was recorded at 0.87, while the Pearson correlation coefficient reached 0.93, reflecting a high degree of agreement between the modeled and observed traffic volumes. These results showed that Greenshield modeling provided a reliable estimation of traffic volume, as evidenced by how the estimated value closely approximated direct field observations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2025.130508
Primary Topic
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Traffic Volume Estimates from Greenshield Modeling Using Google Traffic Data and Field Survey Results in Palembang City, Indonesia

Yusuf Hartono, Edi Kadarsa, Rosidawani Rosidawani, Joni Arliansyah et al.
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
article

Comparison of Traffic Volume Estimates from Greenshield Modeling Using Google Traffic Data and Field Survey Results in Palembang City, Indonesia

Yusuf Hartono, Edi Kadarsa, Rosidawani Rosidawani, Joni Arliansyah, Aztri Yuli Kurnia, Saloma Saloma, Muhammad Imaduddin
article en

Abstract

Traffic volume serves as a critical metric for assessing the efficiency and planning of urban road infrastructure. Traditionally, traffic volume data is collected through field surveys, a process that demands substantial time, resources, and financial investment. As an alternative, the utilization of secondary data sources, such as Google Traffic data, offers a more efficient and cost-effective method for estimating traffic volume with improved accuracy. This study applies Greenshield's modelling to estimate traffic volume. The primary objective of this research is to validate the traffic volume estimation derived from Greenshield's model, using speed data obtained via an API, by comparing it with field-observed traffic survey data in Palembang City, Indonesia. The data retrieved from the Google Traffic server via the Application Programming Interface (API) consists of real-time travel times recorded at 15-minute intervals for a fixed-distance road segment. The real-time speed of a given road segment is computed directly based on the ratio of distance to travel time when data retrieval. The free-flow speed (<img src=image/14841715_01.gif>) is determined under uncongested traffic conditions and is represented by the average speed recorded between 22:00 and 05:00. Meanwhile, the average speed (<img src=image/14841715_02.gif>) corresponds to the traffic conditions observed during specific time periods that align with field survey observations, namely morning (06:00–08:00), afternoon (12:30–14:30), and evening (16:00–18:00). Additionally, the maximum vehicle density (<img src=image/14841715_03.gif>) during congestion is assumed to be 200 pcu/km for each lane. Subsequently, the model integrates the accumulated values of traffic density (<img src=image/14841715_04.gif>) and average vehicle speed (<img src=image/14841715_02.gif>) to determine the traffic volume using an hourly traffic flow (<img src=image/14841715_05.gif>) approach on the road. This study showed a strong correlation existed between traffic volume estimated using Greenshield modeling with Google Traffic speed data and traffic volume data collected from the field survey. The coefficient of determination (<img src=image/14841715_06.gif>) was recorded at 0.87, while the Pearson correlation coefficient reached 0.93, reflecting a high degree of agreement between the modeled and observed traffic volumes. These results showed that Greenshield modeling provided a reliable estimation of traffic volume, as evidenced by how the estimated value closely approximated direct field observations.

Civil Engineering and ArchitectureVol. 13(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Urban Transport Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.