Performance analysis of classical and quantum support vector machines for diagnosis of chronic kidney disease

The kidney is one of the most essential organs in our body, and any problems with it are perilous, hence, the early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is crucial. support vector machine (SVM), a popular machine learning (ML) technique, is an effective solution for building an early CKD diagnosis system. Nowadays ML techniques like SVM are often combined with upcoming quantum computing technology to improve over classical ML. This research uses classical SVM (CSVM) and Quantum SVM (QSVM) to develop a CKD diagnosis system and compare the efficiency of the two diagnosis systems. This research performs different preprocessing on a CKD dataset. Based on the analysis and preprocessing, two data optimization approaches principal component analysis (PCA) and singular value decomposition (SVD) are applied to generate two optimized datasets. Moreover, classification is done on these two datasets by utilizing both CSVM and QSVM. The comprehensive analysis of various techniques reveals that PCA outperforms SVD when paired with both CSVM and QSVM. Utilizing PCA, CSVM achieves a remarkable accuracy of 98.75 %, while QSVM achieves 87.5 % accuracy. In contrast, by utilizing SVD, both CSVM and QSVM achieve relatively lower accuracies, with CSVM achieving 96.25 % accuracy and QSVM achieving 60 % accuracy. The final assessment of this research confirms that QSVM requires more time in classical experimental settings compared to CSVM. Furthermore, the research aims to make it easier to catch CKD early by providing reliable and efficient diagnosis methods. At the same time, it opens the door for trying out new quantum ML ideas in healthcare down the line. • Performance analysis of SVM and QSVM for an automatic CKD detection system. • Understanding the prediction capacity of SVM and QSVM for real-world data with different feature reduction techniques. • Comparative complexity analysis of SVM and QSVM for real-life disease diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Informatics and Health
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoh.2025.08.003
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance analysis of classical and quantum support vector machines for diagnosis of chronic kidney disease

Arslan Munir, Md. Sadiq Iqbal, Mohammad Motiur Rahman, Muhammad Minoar Hossain et al.
Informatics and Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Performance analysis of classical and quantum support vector machines for diagnosis of chronic kidney disease

Arslan Munir, Md. Sadiq Iqbal, Mohammad Motiur Rahman, Muhammad Minoar Hossain, Md. Ahsan Habib, Md Mosaddik Hasan
article en

Abstract

The kidney is one of the most essential organs in our body, and any problems with it are perilous, hence, the early diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is crucial. support vector machine (SVM), a popular machine learning (ML) technique, is an effective solution for building an early CKD diagnosis system. Nowadays ML techniques like SVM are often combined with upcoming quantum computing technology to improve over classical ML. This research uses classical SVM (CSVM) and Quantum SVM (QSVM) to develop a CKD diagnosis system and compare the efficiency of the two diagnosis systems. This research performs different preprocessing on a CKD dataset. Based on the analysis and preprocessing, two data optimization approaches principal component analysis (PCA) and singular value decomposition (SVD) are applied to generate two optimized datasets. Moreover, classification is done on these two datasets by utilizing both CSVM and QSVM. The comprehensive analysis of various techniques reveals that PCA outperforms SVD when paired with both CSVM and QSVM. Utilizing PCA, CSVM achieves a remarkable accuracy of 98.75 %, while QSVM achieves 87.5 % accuracy. In contrast, by utilizing SVD, both CSVM and QSVM achieve relatively lower accuracies, with CSVM achieving 96.25 % accuracy and QSVM achieving 60 % accuracy. The final assessment of this research confirms that QSVM requires more time in classical experimental settings compared to CSVM. Furthermore, the research aims to make it easier to catch CKD early by providing reliable and efficient diagnosis methods. At the same time, it opens the door for trying out new quantum ML ideas in healthcare down the line. • Performance analysis of SVM and QSVM for an automatic CKD detection system. • Understanding the prediction capacity of SVM and QSVM for real-world data with different feature reduction techniques. • Comparative complexity analysis of SVM and QSVM for real-life disease diagnosis.

Informatics and Health
Bangladesh University (BD), Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University (BD), Bangladesh University of Business and Technology (BD), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.