How do you measure the success and impact of a core facility?

What makes a successful core facility? While many metrics are suggested and requested to evaluate the success and impact of a core, a comprehensive understanding of the priority of the institution and core and how each metric fits into the overall strategy for the core facility is critical before determining research value or success in specific instances. A description of some different metrics commonly used to evaluate cores is presented in addition to the variable impact or interpretation of the metric in the case of different core facility structures. For example, in the case of a research - focused institution or core facility, the number and type of publications contributed to may be highly valued. Contrastingly, publications may be of less evaluative value in the case of a teaching or discovery - prioritized institution. Overall, we suggest a balanced view of core evaluation that presents each indicator in the specific context of the institution and specific core and technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioTechniques
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07366205.2025.2555118
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do you measure the success and impact of a core facility?

Michelle S. Itano, Kara A. Clissold
BioTechniques
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

How do you measure the success and impact of a core facility?

Michelle S. Itano, Kara A. Clissold
article en

Abstract

What makes a successful core facility? While many metrics are suggested and requested to evaluate the success and impact of a core, a comprehensive understanding of the priority of the institution and core and how each metric fits into the overall strategy for the core facility is critical before determining research value or success in specific instances. A description of some different metrics commonly used to evaluate cores is presented in addition to the variable impact or interpretation of the metric in the case of different core facility structures. For example, in the case of a research - focused institution or core facility, the number and type of publications contributed to may be highly valued. Contrastingly, publications may be of less evaluative value in the case of a teaching or discovery - prioritized institution. Overall, we suggest a balanced view of core evaluation that presents each indicator in the specific context of the institution and specific core and technology.

BioTechniquesVol. 77(7-8)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do you measure the success and impact of a core facility? — Michelle S. Itano, Kara A. Clissold · BioTechniques (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS