Confabulation dynamics in a reservoir computer: Filling in the gaps with untrained attractors

Artificial intelligence has advanced significantly in recent years, thanks to innovations in the design and training of artificial neural networks (ANNs). Despite these advancements, we still understand relatively little about how elementary forms of ANNs learn, fail to learn, and generate false information without the intent to deceive, a phenomenon known as "confabulation." To provide some foundational insight, in this paper, we analyze how confabulation occurs in reservoir computers (RCs): a dynamical system in the form of an ANN. RCs are particularly useful to study as they are known to confabulate in a well-defined way: when RCs are trained to reconstruct the dynamics of a given attractor, they sometimes construct an attractor that they were not trained to construct, a so-called "untrained attractor" (UA). This paper sheds light on the role played by UAs when reconstruction fails and their influence when modeling transitions between reconstructed attractors. Based on our results, we conclude that UAs are an intrinsic feature of learning systems whose state spaces are bounded and that this means of confabulation may be present in systems beyond RCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0283285
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confabulation dynamics in a reservoir computer: Filling in the gaps with untrained attractors

Andrew Keane, Andrew Flynn, Jack O’Hagan
5 citations
Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
12.40
article

Confabulation dynamics in a reservoir computer: Filling in the gaps with untrained attractors

Andrew Keane, Andrew Flynn, Jack O’Hagan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has advanced significantly in recent years, thanks to innovations in the design and training of artificial neural networks (ANNs). Despite these advancements, we still understand relatively little about how elementary forms of ANNs learn, fail to learn, and generate false information without the intent to deceive, a phenomenon known as "confabulation." To provide some foundational insight, in this paper, we analyze how confabulation occurs in reservoir computers (RCs): a dynamical system in the form of an ANN. RCs are particularly useful to study as they are known to confabulate in a well-defined way: when RCs are trained to reconstruct the dynamics of a given attractor, they sometimes construct an attractor that they were not trained to construct, a so-called "untrained attractor" (UA). This paper sheds light on the role played by UAs when reconstruction fails and their influence when modeling transitions between reconstructed attractors. Based on our results, we conclude that UAs are an intrinsic feature of learning systems whose state spaces are bounded and that this means of confabulation may be present in systems beyond RCs.

Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear ScienceVol. 35(9)
University College Cork (IE), Infant (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.