The market price of greenness: a factor pricing approach for green and conventional bonds

Abstract This paper distinguishes itself from previous studies and contributes to the literature by estimating a green premium using a factor model framework. Specifically, we propose a two-factor model, where bond returns are explained not only by a systemic market risk factor but also by a systemic green risk factor. Using the Fama and MacBeth regression approach on a sample of Euro-denominated green and conventional bonds over the period 06.11.2014–30.06.2021, we estimate the green premium disentangling its two components: the sensitivity to systemic greenness (i.e. magnitude of risk) and the price of green risk. Three main results emerge from our research. First, we find that the price of green risk is significant and positive albeit small. Second, the sign of the green premium is substantially driven by the issuer macro sector rather than by the green label, being on average negative for Financial bonds and positive for Government and Non-Financial ones, whereby this difference can be explained by a more direct exposure to green systemic risk in the latter two cases. Third, looking at the dynamics of the green risk price we find it decreases to almost zero as the bond market reaches a new normal, but it becomes negative during Covid-19 pandemic, suggesting greenness is considered a benefit in periods of financial distress caused by negative economic shocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Finance
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-025-00469-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The market price of greenness: a factor pricing approach for green and conventional bonds

Beatrice Bertelli, Costanza Torricelli, Gianna Boero
1 citations
Annals of Finance
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.21
article

The market price of greenness: a factor pricing approach for green and conventional bonds

Beatrice Bertelli, Costanza Torricelli, Gianna Boero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper distinguishes itself from previous studies and contributes to the literature by estimating a green premium using a factor model framework. Specifically, we propose a two-factor model, where bond returns are explained not only by a systemic market risk factor but also by a systemic green risk factor. Using the Fama and MacBeth regression approach on a sample of Euro-denominated green and conventional bonds over the period 06.11.2014–30.06.2021, we estimate the green premium disentangling its two components: the sensitivity to systemic greenness (i.e. magnitude of risk) and the price of green risk. Three main results emerge from our research. First, we find that the price of green risk is significant and positive albeit small. Second, the sign of the green premium is substantially driven by the issuer macro sector rather than by the green label, being on average negative for Financial bonds and positive for Government and Non-Financial ones, whereby this difference can be explained by a more direct exposure to green systemic risk in the latter two cases. Third, looking at the dynamics of the green risk price we find it decreases to almost zero as the bond market reaches a new normal, but it becomes negative during Covid-19 pandemic, suggesting greenness is considered a benefit in periods of financial distress caused by negative economic shocks.

Annals of FinanceVol. 21(3)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Warwick (GB)
Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.