Kleine Dick en de grote Ander — Klein en Lacan over symbolisering

Dick and the Big Other — Klein and Lacan on symbolization Klein’s famous case of ‹Dick› (1930) has become paradigmatic for her understanding of the dynamics of sadism, projection and introjection, ego development and symbolization. In his 1953-1954 seminar, Lacan critiques this case over the course of several lectures, pointing out his differences with Kleinian theory and proposing an alternative framework to understand the case. This article explores the fault lines between the Anglo-Saxon and Lacanian psychoanalytic traditions through the lens of this historical dialectic. The crucial and enduring importance of the theoretical disagreement on the nature of the ego is discussed, as well as Lacan’s (mis)reading of the Kleinian notion of phantasy through an imaginary lens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tijdschrift voor psychoanalyse & haar toepassingen.
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/pa/259027332025031003002
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kleine Dick en de grote Ander — Klein en Lacan over symbolisering

Witold van Ratingen
Tijdschrift voor psychoanalyse & haar toepassingen.
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

Kleine Dick en de grote Ander — Klein en Lacan over symbolisering

Witold van Ratingen
article en

Abstract

Dick and the Big Other — Klein and Lacan on symbolization Klein’s famous case of ‹Dick› (1930) has become paradigmatic for her understanding of the dynamics of sadism, projection and introjection, ego development and symbolization. In his 1953-1954 seminar, Lacan critiques this case over the course of several lectures, pointing out his differences with Kleinian theory and proposing an alternative framework to understand the case. This article explores the fault lines between the Anglo-Saxon and Lacanian psychoanalytic traditions through the lens of this historical dialectic. The crucial and enduring importance of the theoretical disagreement on the nature of the ego is discussed, as well as Lacan’s (mis)reading of the Kleinian notion of phantasy through an imaginary lens.

Tijdschrift voor psychoanalyse & haar toepassingen.Vol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.