Study on the Energy and Power Transformation Pathways and Scenario Determination Considering Multiple Objectives

To achieve the goal of carbon peak carbon neutralization, energy is the main battlefield, and power is the main force. Accelerating the construction of new power systems and promoting the green and low-carbon transformation of power are crucial for carbon mitigation. Exploring the multi-objective coordinated development of safety, cost and low-carbon is an urgent issue for China to promote the construction of a new power system. Based on the National Energy Strategy and Planning model (NESAP), this study proposes the new power system's development path and pattern evolution trend and compares and optimizes the scenarios. The results show that: (1) considering the macroeconomic impact of power system transformation and the system's own security-cost-low carbon goal, achieving medium and long-term sustainable development in the rapid carbon removal scenario is more beneficial under the equal weight evaluation framework. (2) Technological progress helps to control and reduce the investment cost and total cost of power generation. Under the scenario of high-speed technological progress, the total carbon emission of the power system is reduced by 13 % compared with the low-speed scenario. Although technological progress may require higher research and transformation investment in the short term, these investments will bring higher economic returns, better environmental impact and more reliable power supply in the long term. By 2060, compared with the benchmark scenario, the cumulative investment cost of the high-speed technological progress scenario has decreased by nearly 30 %, and the total cumulative power generation cost has decreased by 20.2 %, significantly reducing the power industry cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/psgec66102.2025.11151076
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Energy and Power Transformation Pathways and Scenario Determination Considering Multiple Objectives

Bo Yuan, Haitao Chen, Peng Xia
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Study on the Energy and Power Transformation Pathways and Scenario Determination Considering Multiple Objectives

Bo Yuan, Haitao Chen, Peng Xia
article en

Abstract

To achieve the goal of carbon peak carbon neutralization, energy is the main battlefield, and power is the main force. Accelerating the construction of new power systems and promoting the green and low-carbon transformation of power are crucial for carbon mitigation. Exploring the multi-objective coordinated development of safety, cost and low-carbon is an urgent issue for China to promote the construction of a new power system. Based on the National Energy Strategy and Planning model (NESAP), this study proposes the new power system's development path and pattern evolution trend and compares and optimizes the scenarios. The results show that: (1) considering the macroeconomic impact of power system transformation and the system's own security-cost-low carbon goal, achieving medium and long-term sustainable development in the rapid carbon removal scenario is more beneficial under the equal weight evaluation framework. (2) Technological progress helps to control and reduce the investment cost and total cost of power generation. Under the scenario of high-speed technological progress, the total carbon emission of the power system is reduced by 13 % compared with the low-speed scenario. Although technological progress may require higher research and transformation investment in the short term, these investments will bring higher economic returns, better environmental impact and more reliable power supply in the long term. By 2060, compared with the benchmark scenario, the cumulative investment cost of the high-speed technological progress scenario has decreased by nearly 30 %, and the total cumulative power generation cost has decreased by 20.2 %, significantly reducing the power industry cost.

Energy Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.