Feasible Space Monitoring for Multiple Control Barrier Functions with Application to Large Scale Indoor Navigation
Quadratic programs (QP) subject to multiple time-dependent control barrier function (CBF) based constraints have been used to design safety-critical controllers. However, ensuring the existence of a solution at all times to the QP subject to multiple CBF constraints (hereby called compatibility) is non-trivial. We quantify the feasible control input space defined by multiple CBFs at a state in terms of its volume. We then introduce a novel feasible space (FS) CBF that prevents this volume from going to zero. FS-CBF is shown to be a sufficient condition for the compatibility of multiple CBFs. For high-dimensional systems though, finding a valid FS-CBF may be difficult due to the limitations of existing computational hardware or theoretical approaches. In such cases, we show empirically that imposing the feasible space volume as a candidate FS-CBF not only enhances feasibility but also exhibits reduced sensitivity to changes in the userchosen parameters such as gains of the nominal controller. Finally, paired with a global planner, we evaluate our controller for navigation among other dynamically moving agents in the AWS Hospital gazebo environment. The proposed controller is demonstrated to outperform the standard CBF-QP controller in maintaining feasibility.
Authors
- Mitchell Black (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-1331)
- Hardik Parwana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-2108)
- Hideki Okamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2533-9581)
- Bardh Hoxha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-7566)
- Georgios Fainekos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-2129)
- Dimitra Panagou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-167X)
- Danil Prokhorov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6208-4233)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ccta53793.2025.11151444
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.44