Extracorporeal Life Support in a Porcine Model of Septic Endotoxemia with Acute Pulmonary Hypertension: An Experimental Study

<b>Background</b>: This study evaluated the effects of veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venoarterial (V-VA) ECMO in a porcine model of septic endotoxemia-induced acute pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Our hypotheses were as follows: (1) V-VA ECMO lowers pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by delivering oxygenated blood to the pulmonary circulation, and (2) both V-A and V-VA ECMO improve perfusion to vital organs while simultaneously unloading the right ventricle (RV). <b>Methods</b>: Acute PAH was induced with <i>Salmonella abortus equi</i> lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in 34 pigs. Animals were randomized to either a control group without ECMO or to two groups receiving V-A or V-VA ECMO. <b>Results</b>: All animals developed PAH after one hour of LPS infusion: mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increased significantly from 26 (24-30) mmHg to 40 (34-46) mmHg (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and PVR increased from 314 (221-390) to 787 (549-1073) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Neither V-A nor V-VA ECMO significantly reduced PVR compared to controls. RV end-diastolic area increased in the control group [6.1 (4.3-8.6) cm vs. 8.5 (7.8-9.7) cm, <i>p</i> = 0.2], but not in the V-A [4.7 (3.3-7.6) cm] and V-VA [4.3 (2.5-8.3) cm] ECMO groups. Blood flow in the cranial mesenteric artery and celiac trunk did not differ significantly with or without ECMO. <b>Conclusions</b>: Elevating pulmonary artery oxygen tension through V-A or V-VA ECMO did not reduce PVR or PAP. However, both ECMO configurations effectively unloaded the RV and maintained perfusion to abdominal organs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176342
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extracorporeal Life Support in a Porcine Model of Septic Endotoxemia with Acute Pulmonary Hypertension: An Experimental Study

Manfred Thiel, Tobias Spanier, Stany Sandrio, Joerg Krebs et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Extracorporeal Life Support in a Porcine Model of Septic Endotoxemia with Acute Pulmonary Hypertension: An Experimental Study

Manfred Thiel, Tobias Spanier, Stany Sandrio, Joerg Krebs, Grietje Beck, Peter T. Graf
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: This study evaluated the effects of veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venoarterial (V-VA) ECMO in a porcine model of septic endotoxemia-induced acute pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Our hypotheses were as follows: (1) V-VA ECMO lowers pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by delivering oxygenated blood to the pulmonary circulation, and (2) both V-A and V-VA ECMO improve perfusion to vital organs while simultaneously unloading the right ventricle (RV). <b>Methods</b>: Acute PAH was induced with <i>Salmonella abortus equi</i> lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in 34 pigs. Animals were randomized to either a control group without ECMO or to two groups receiving V-A or V-VA ECMO. <b>Results</b>: All animals developed PAH after one hour of LPS infusion: mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increased significantly from 26 (24-30) mmHg to 40 (34-46) mmHg (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and PVR increased from 314 (221-390) to 787 (549-1073) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Neither V-A nor V-VA ECMO significantly reduced PVR compared to controls. RV end-diastolic area increased in the control group [6.1 (4.3-8.6) cm vs. 8.5 (7.8-9.7) cm, <i>p</i> = 0.2], but not in the V-A [4.7 (3.3-7.6) cm] and V-VA [4.3 (2.5-8.3) cm] ECMO groups. Blood flow in the cranial mesenteric artery and celiac trunk did not differ significantly with or without ECMO. <b>Conclusions</b>: Elevating pulmonary artery oxygen tension through V-A or V-VA ECMO did not reduce PVR or PAP. However, both ECMO configurations effectively unloaded the RV and maintained perfusion to abdominal organs.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.