Stake-Based Block Generation and Its Impact on Ethereum Transaction Efficiency

Ethereum's transition from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism has significantly altered the network’s block generation process and transaction efficiency. This study investigates the impact of stake-based block generation on Ethereum’s transaction fees, block density, and overall network performance by analyzing a dataset containing 303 records of Ethereum blockchain activity. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between block generation rate and stake reward (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) and coin stake (r = 0.74, p < 0.01), indicating that validators with larger stakes generate blocks more frequently. Additionally, transaction fees positively correlate with block density (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), suggesting that network congestion remains a key determinant of transaction costs, despite the PoS transition. Further analysis shows that Ethereum’s PoS system optimizes block space utilization, with an observed mean block density of 1393.6% and a transaction fee standard deviation of 0.12 ETH, demonstrating a more stable fee structure than PoW. The average transaction fee recorded is 0.179 ETH, with a maximum observed fee of 0.98 ETH and a minimum of 0 ETH in some cases. While PoS provides greater fee stability, minor fluctuations in fees persist due to congestion-related effects. Additionally, the mean stake reward is 0.98, suggesting a relatively stable staking incentive structure across different blocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Research in Blockchain.
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47738/jcrb.v2i3.44
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stake-Based Block Generation and Its Impact on Ethereum Transaction Efficiency

Gao Haodic
2 citations
Journal of Current Research in Blockchain.
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
article

Stake-Based Block Generation and Its Impact on Ethereum Transaction Efficiency

Gao Haodic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ethereum's transition from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism has significantly altered the network’s block generation process and transaction efficiency. This study investigates the impact of stake-based block generation on Ethereum’s transaction fees, block density, and overall network performance by analyzing a dataset containing 303 records of Ethereum blockchain activity. The findings reveal a strong positive correlation between block generation rate and stake reward (r = 0.78, p < 0.01) and coin stake (r = 0.74, p < 0.01), indicating that validators with larger stakes generate blocks more frequently. Additionally, transaction fees positively correlate with block density (r = 0.65, p < 0.01), suggesting that network congestion remains a key determinant of transaction costs, despite the PoS transition. Further analysis shows that Ethereum’s PoS system optimizes block space utilization, with an observed mean block density of 1393.6% and a transaction fee standard deviation of 0.12 ETH, demonstrating a more stable fee structure than PoW. The average transaction fee recorded is 0.179 ETH, with a maximum observed fee of 0.98 ETH and a minimum of 0 ETH in some cases. While PoS provides greater fee stability, minor fluctuations in fees persist due to congestion-related effects. Additionally, the mean stake reward is 0.98, suggesting a relatively stable staking incentive structure across different blocks.

Journal of Current Research in Blockchain.Vol. 2(3)
INTI International University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.