Future-oriented policy instrument choice for national technology development: A Delphi survey approach for advanced energy technology fields

The new round of scientific and industrial revolution has brought both opportunities and challenges for national technological development. To grasp the opportunities, we highlight that policymakers should consider the choice of policies from the foresight perspective of future-oriented long-term technological development, rather than focusing only on a backward-looking view. The purpose of this study is to develop an analytical framework for future-oriented policy instrument choice. In particular, we adopt a large-scale Delphi survey method with more than 300 experts participating and focus on advanced energy technology fields in China. As a result, the analytical framework is developed considering the diverse effects of policies on different technology fields and on different stages of technological development. Based on the analysis of the impact of four types of policy instruments on different stages of the technological development of nine advanced technology fields (including 91 subtechnologies) in energy fields, the empirical results show that the policy instrument of research and development (R&D) investment is the main factor that affects the development of all nine advanced technologies in energy fields in China. The four types of policy instruments play various roles in three stages of technological development and in nine advanced technology fields. Based on our findings, we propose policy recommendations. Specifically, policy instruments should be dynamically adjusted based on the stage of technological development within different advanced energy fields. • We investigate the future-oriented policy instrument choices for China's national technology foresight practice. • We develop an analytical framework to analyze the choice of energy policy based on three dimensions. • We make contribution by opening the process of technological development into three development stages. • We contribute to the research on the choice of policy instruments with a future-oriented focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101867
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future-oriented policy instrument choice for national technology development: A Delphi survey approach for advanced energy technology fields

Tara Qian Sun, Kaihua Chen, Rongping Mu, Zhipeng Ren
Energy Strategy Reviews
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Future-oriented policy instrument choice for national technology development: A Delphi survey approach for advanced energy technology fields

Tara Qian Sun, Kaihua Chen, Rongping Mu, Zhipeng Ren
article en

Abstract

The new round of scientific and industrial revolution has brought both opportunities and challenges for national technological development. To grasp the opportunities, we highlight that policymakers should consider the choice of policies from the foresight perspective of future-oriented long-term technological development, rather than focusing only on a backward-looking view. The purpose of this study is to develop an analytical framework for future-oriented policy instrument choice. In particular, we adopt a large-scale Delphi survey method with more than 300 experts participating and focus on advanced energy technology fields in China. As a result, the analytical framework is developed considering the diverse effects of policies on different technology fields and on different stages of technological development. Based on the analysis of the impact of four types of policy instruments on different stages of the technological development of nine advanced technology fields (including 91 subtechnologies) in energy fields, the empirical results show that the policy instrument of research and development (R&D) investment is the main factor that affects the development of all nine advanced technologies in energy fields in China. The four types of policy instruments play various roles in three stages of technological development and in nine advanced technology fields. Based on our findings, we propose policy recommendations. Specifically, policy instruments should be dynamically adjusted based on the stage of technological development within different advanced energy fields. • We investigate the future-oriented policy instrument choices for China's national technology foresight practice. • We develop an analytical framework to analyze the choice of energy policy based on three dimensions. • We make contribution by opening the process of technological development into three development stages. • We contribute to the research on the choice of policy instruments with a future-oriented focus.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 61
National Development and Reform Commission (CN), Institutes of Science and Development (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.