Slow Progress: School Finance Reforms and Racial Disparities in Funding

School funding has become more economically progressive but remains unequal by race/ethnicity. As desegregation efforts decline, school finance reforms (SFRs) are increasingly important for addressing racial/ethnic funding disparities, but their implications are unclear. We build on existing work by estimating SFR effects on funding by income, race, and ethnicity, extending analysis through 2022, using recently developed difference-in-differences models to address variation in SFR timing, and examining additional and recent SFRs. We find that SFRs increased funding equality by income but at best had only modest benefits for equality by race/ethnicity. SFRs were more effective at reducing racial funding inequality in states with low initial inequality and low race-by-income segregation. Results highlight limitations of class-based state reforms to address racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251362855
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Slow Progress: School Finance Reforms and Racial Disparities in Funding

Emily Rauscher, Jeremy E. Fiel
1 links
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
School Choice and Performance
article

Slow Progress: School Finance Reforms and Racial Disparities in Funding

Emily Rauscher, Jeremy E. Fiel
article en

Abstract

School funding has become more economically progressive but remains unequal by race/ethnicity. As desegregation efforts decline, school finance reforms (SFRs) are increasingly important for addressing racial/ethnic funding disparities, but their implications are unclear. We build on existing work by estimating SFR effects on funding by income, race, and ethnicity, extending analysis through 2022, using recently developed difference-in-differences models to address variation in SFR timing, and examining additional and recent SFRs. We find that SFRs increased funding equality by income but at best had only modest benefits for equality by race/ethnicity. SFRs were more effective at reducing racial funding inequality in states with low initial inequality and low race-by-income segregation. Results highlight limitations of class-based state reforms to address racial/ethnic disparities.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
John Brown University (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Slow Progress: School Finance Reforms and Racial Disparities in Funding — Emily Rauscher, Jeremy E. Fiel · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS