Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories

The challenges associated with achieving high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance have become increasingly critical globally, leading to resource allocation issues, compliance complexities, and potential short-term disruptions in innovation activities, particularly within technology-intensive sectors. Despite the growing importance of ESG initiatives, limited studies in management have explored how ESG performance impacts different dimensions of firm innovation. This study investigates how ESG performance influences ambidextrous innovation, namely exploratory and exploitative innovation, among Chinese-listed new energy vehicle companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, suggesting that initial ESG investments may hinder innovation owing to resource diversion and regulatory pressures, while sustained ESG efforts eventually lead to significant innovation gains. Government subsidies and market competition act as moderating factors in this relationship. Although both factors generally support innovation, their misalignment with ESG strategies may diminish their positive influence. Moreover, we identify financial constraints and risk propensity as mediating mechanisms. Enhanced ESG performance reduces financing barriers and encourages firms to undertake innovation-related risks. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and managers seeking to align ESG practices with innovation objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and balanced innovation outcomes in China and beyond.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100804
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories

Huanyong Ji, Jing Huang, Keke Sun, Zeyu Xing
4 citations
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Environmental Sustainability in Business
8.29
article

Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories

Huanyong Ji, Jing Huang, Keke Sun, Zeyu Xing
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The challenges associated with achieving high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance have become increasingly critical globally, leading to resource allocation issues, compliance complexities, and potential short-term disruptions in innovation activities, particularly within technology-intensive sectors. Despite the growing importance of ESG initiatives, limited studies in management have explored how ESG performance impacts different dimensions of firm innovation. This study investigates how ESG performance influences ambidextrous innovation, namely exploratory and exploitative innovation, among Chinese-listed new energy vehicle companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings reveal a U-shaped relationship, suggesting that initial ESG investments may hinder innovation owing to resource diversion and regulatory pressures, while sustained ESG efforts eventually lead to significant innovation gains. Government subsidies and market competition act as moderating factors in this relationship. Although both factors generally support innovation, their misalignment with ESG strategies may diminish their positive influence. Moreover, we identify financial constraints and risk propensity as mediating mechanisms. Enhanced ESG performance reduces financing barriers and encourages firms to undertake innovation-related risks. These findings offer important insights for policymakers and managers seeking to align ESG practices with innovation objectives, thereby contributing to more sustainable and balanced innovation outcomes in China and beyond.

Journal of Innovation & KnowledgeVol. 10(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance lead to ambidextrous innovation? Integrating stakeholder and institutional theories — Huanyong Ji, Jing Huang, et al. · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS