Balancing Benefit and Risk: Continuing Tirzepatide after Allergic Reactions

Abstract Tirzepatide is increasingly used for weight management in individuals with obesity. This case report explores the ethical, legal, and clinical considerations involved in continued tirzepatide therapy supported by antihistamine co-treatment after a mild allergic reaction in a patient with severe obesity. A 48-year-old woman with a body mass index of 38 kg/m2 developed a localized erythematous skin reaction at the injection site following dose escalation of tirzepatide, lasting 5 to 6 days after each injection. The reaction persisted despite the use of antihistamines. Motivated by the significant weight loss (12 kg in 6 weeks) and the mild nature of the reaction, a shared decision was made to continue therapy under close monitoring. This was later reconsidered when the benefit of weight loss ceased. This case illustrates a cautious, ethically grounded approach to individualized therapy continuation following mild allergic reactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1811649
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Benefit and Risk: Continuing Tirzepatide after Allergic Reactions

Salem Beshyah
Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Balancing Benefit and Risk: Continuing Tirzepatide after Allergic Reactions

Salem Beshyah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Tirzepatide is increasingly used for weight management in individuals with obesity. This case report explores the ethical, legal, and clinical considerations involved in continued tirzepatide therapy supported by antihistamine co-treatment after a mild allergic reaction in a patient with severe obesity. A 48-year-old woman with a body mass index of 38 kg/m2 developed a localized erythematous skin reaction at the injection site following dose escalation of tirzepatide, lasting 5 to 6 days after each injection. The reaction persisted despite the use of antihistamines. Motivated by the significant weight loss (12 kg in 6 weeks) and the mild nature of the reaction, a shared decision was made to continue therapy under close monitoring. This was later reconsidered when the benefit of weight loss ceased. This case illustrates a cautious, ethically grounded approach to individualized therapy continuation following mild allergic reactions.

Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical SciencesVol. 17(03)
Dubai Medical College (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing Benefit and Risk: Continuing Tirzepatide after Allergic Reactions — Salem Beshyah · Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS