Comparing and contrasting property tax oversight systems - Idaho and The Netherlands

Property tax system administration may occur at national, sub-national, or local levels and includes identification and valuation of taxable property, establishing tax rates, and billing and collection of taxes. Regardless of the initial assignment of responsibilities for these functions, both internal and external oversight are crucial to: • Providing accountability; • Maintaining public trust; • Ensuring compliance with laws; • Producing a transparent property tax system. Although much of this can be accomplished by internal quality control mechanisms, the existence of an oversight body operating independently from the valuation agency or those responsible for the tax components enables such independent corroboration of adherence to laws and good principles and practices. This type of multi-layered system exists in many places and this paper presents two such models – one in the State of Idaho in the United States and the other in The Netherlands - including the evolution of each system and how each system relates to guidance provided by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63642/3067-4816.1278
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing and contrasting property tax oversight systems - Idaho and The Netherlands

Mia de Kuijper, Alan S. Dornfest
Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

Comparing and contrasting property tax oversight systems - Idaho and The Netherlands

Mia de Kuijper, Alan S. Dornfest
article en

Abstract

Property tax system administration may occur at national, sub-national, or local levels and includes identification and valuation of taxable property, establishing tax rates, and billing and collection of taxes. Regardless of the initial assignment of responsibilities for these functions, both internal and external oversight are crucial to: • Providing accountability; • Maintaining public trust; • Ensuring compliance with laws; • Producing a transparent property tax system. Although much of this can be accomplished by internal quality control mechanisms, the existence of an oversight body operating independently from the valuation agency or those responsible for the tax components enables such independent corroboration of adherence to laws and good principles and practices. This type of multi-layered system exists in many places and this paper presents two such models – one in the State of Idaho in the United States and the other in The Netherlands - including the evolution of each system and how each system relates to guidance provided by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO).

Journal of Property Tax Assessment & AdministrationVol. 22(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.