Deciphering the Interactions of Carbon Nanotubes and Super P with Silicon and Graphite Active Materials in Silicon‐Graphite Negative Electrode‐Based Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Abstract In high‐capacity Silicon (Si)‐based negative electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries (LIBs), conductive additives play a pivotal role for preserving electrical conductivity and electrode integrity, boosting the electrochemical performance. This study presents how defect‐mediated Multi‐walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) impact battery performance when employed as conductive additive material in both high‐capacity Si and low‐capacity graphite (Gr) electrodes. For benchmarking, state‐of‐the‐art carbon black (Super P) is used. Half‐cell test results of MWCNTs‐based Si‐rich Si/Gr (60/28) blended electrodes exhibit a specific discharge capacity of 534.2 ± 21.1 mAh g −1 with a capacity retention of 73.3% at 100th cycle, surpassing Super P‐based counterparts, which achieve only 436.1 ± 16.3 mAh g −1 and 61.7% retention at the same cycle. However, for Gr‐rich Si/Gr (20/68) blended electrodes, the discrepancies in performance and capacity retention between both conductive additives is less significant than in the Si‐rich Si/Gr electrode system. Imaging and spectroscopic analyses reveal that the differences in performance originate from the distinctive interactions between the surface functional groups of the conductive additives and those of the active materials. Overall, the findings highlight the critical role of defect‐mediated interaction chemistry in MWCNTs in boosting electrochemical performance, offering valuable insights for the design of next‐generation LIB electrodes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202500503
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deciphering the Interactions of Carbon Nanotubes and Super P with Silicon and Graphite Active Materials in Silicon‐Graphite Negative Electrode‐Based Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Egbert Figgemeier, Gebrekidan Gebresilassie Eshetu, Felix M. Weber, Leyla Ünal et al.
1 citations
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Advancements in Battery Materials
0.73
article

Deciphering the Interactions of Carbon Nanotubes and Super P with Silicon and Graphite Active Materials in Silicon‐Graphite Negative Electrode‐Based Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Egbert Figgemeier, Gebrekidan Gebresilassie Eshetu, Felix M. Weber, Leyla Ünal, Viviane‐Maccio Figgemeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In high‐capacity Silicon (Si)‐based negative electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries (LIBs), conductive additives play a pivotal role for preserving electrical conductivity and electrode integrity, boosting the electrochemical performance. This study presents how defect‐mediated Multi‐walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs) impact battery performance when employed as conductive additive material in both high‐capacity Si and low‐capacity graphite (Gr) electrodes. For benchmarking, state‐of‐the‐art carbon black (Super P) is used. Half‐cell test results of MWCNTs‐based Si‐rich Si/Gr (60/28) blended electrodes exhibit a specific discharge capacity of 534.2 ± 21.1 mAh g −1 with a capacity retention of 73.3% at 100th cycle, surpassing Super P‐based counterparts, which achieve only 436.1 ± 16.3 mAh g −1 and 61.7% retention at the same cycle. However, for Gr‐rich Si/Gr (20/68) blended electrodes, the discrepancies in performance and capacity retention between both conductive additives is less significant than in the Si‐rich Si/Gr electrode system. Imaging and spectroscopic analyses reveal that the differences in performance originate from the distinctive interactions between the surface functional groups of the conductive additives and those of the active materials. Overall, the findings highlight the critical role of defect‐mediated interaction chemistry in MWCNTs in boosting electrochemical performance, offering valuable insights for the design of next‐generation LIB electrodes.

Advanced Materials InterfacesVol. 12(22)
Helmholtz-Institute Münster (DE), Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE), Mekelle University (ET), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
European Commission, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advancements in Battery Materials
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.