Hybrid Neural Network Modeling of Mechanical Alloying Process Parameters and Alloy Performance Using Forward and Reverse Mapping

ABSTRACT Mechanical alloying (MA) process synthesizes a nanostructured Ti‐Mg‐Zr ternary alloy suitable for biomedical applications. The desirable characteristics of titanium, magnesium, and zirconium (such as high biocompatibility, corrosion resistance and low density) enable the development of alloys with minimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts. Retaining the nanostructure (alloy performances such as crystallite size CS and lattice strain LS) in Ti‐Mg‐Zr alloys is influenced by MA parameters (milling speed: MS, duration: MD, and ball‐to‐powder‐weight ratio: BPR). The present work establishes forward and reverse modeling between the MA parameters and alloy performance using neural networks such as artificial bee colony (ABC‐NN), backpropagation (BPNN), and genetic algorithm (GA‐NN). Forward modeling predicts alloy performances from known MA parameters, while reverse modeling estimates the MA parameters for the desired alloy performances. A dataset of 1,000 samples was generated using empirical regression equations and was supplied to networks in batch mode. A detailed parametric study was conducted to optimize network parameters. The optimized network parameters resulted in reduced mean squared error (MSE) corresponding to forward and reverse modeling tasks equal to 0.0021 and 0.0065 for ABC‐NN, 0.0056 and 0.0097 for BPNN, and 0.0034 and 0.0076 for GA‐NN, respectively. The trained networks are tested against 10 randomly generated experimental cases for forward and reverse predictions, resulting in 3.41% and 3.55% for BPNN, 3.24% and 3.30% for ABC‐NN, and 3.30% and 3.33% for GA‐NN, respectively. The ABC‐NN predictions help industry personnel to scale up the synthesis of nanostructured Ti‐Mg‐Zr alloy for permanent implants requiring regular MRI examinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70344
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Neural Network Modeling of Mechanical Alloying Process Parameters and Alloy Performance Using Forward and Reverse Mapping

Oğuzhan Der, S. Parameshwara, Chithirai Pon Selvan, N.B. Pradeep et al.
1 citations
Engineering Reports
Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
0.52
article

Hybrid Neural Network Modeling of Mechanical Alloying Process Parameters and Alloy Performance Using Forward and Reverse Mapping

Oğuzhan Der, S. Parameshwara, Chithirai Pon Selvan, N.B. Pradeep, Manjunath Patel Gowdru Chandrashekarappa, Girisha Kanuvanahalli Bettaiah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mechanical alloying (MA) process synthesizes a nanostructured Ti‐Mg‐Zr ternary alloy suitable for biomedical applications. The desirable characteristics of titanium, magnesium, and zirconium (such as high biocompatibility, corrosion resistance and low density) enable the development of alloys with minimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts. Retaining the nanostructure (alloy performances such as crystallite size CS and lattice strain LS) in Ti‐Mg‐Zr alloys is influenced by MA parameters (milling speed: MS, duration: MD, and ball‐to‐powder‐weight ratio: BPR). The present work establishes forward and reverse modeling between the MA parameters and alloy performance using neural networks such as artificial bee colony (ABC‐NN), backpropagation (BPNN), and genetic algorithm (GA‐NN). Forward modeling predicts alloy performances from known MA parameters, while reverse modeling estimates the MA parameters for the desired alloy performances. A dataset of 1,000 samples was generated using empirical regression equations and was supplied to networks in batch mode. A detailed parametric study was conducted to optimize network parameters. The optimized network parameters resulted in reduced mean squared error (MSE) corresponding to forward and reverse modeling tasks equal to 0.0021 and 0.0065 for ABC‐NN, 0.0056 and 0.0097 for BPNN, and 0.0034 and 0.0076 for GA‐NN, respectively. The trained networks are tested against 10 randomly generated experimental cases for forward and reverse predictions, resulting in 3.41% and 3.55% for BPNN, 3.24% and 3.30% for ABC‐NN, and 3.30% and 3.33% for GA‐NN, respectively. The ABC‐NN predictions help industry personnel to scale up the synthesis of nanostructured Ti‐Mg‐Zr alloy for permanent implants requiring regular MRI examinations.

Engineering ReportsVol. 7(9)
University of Dubai (AE), Curtin University (AU), Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University (TR), Changchun University (CN), Visvesvaraya Technological University (IN)
Curtin University of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.