Structural analysis of the food processing industry

The food processing industry uses agricultural, livestock, and fishery products as raw materials to produce processed foods, serving as a major consumer of these products and a key contributor to their added value.Since 2008, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs has been fostering Korea's food manufacturing industry, which now has a market size of 83.1 trillion Korean won.The food processing industry is subdivided into various sectors according to product categories, with each sub-sector exhibiting distinct structural characteristics.While certain sub-sectors are marked by a high degree of oligopoly, others are characterized by a competitive market structure involving a large number of firms.Given that the structural differences among sub-sectors of the food processing industry are critical factors in the formulation of relevant policies, it is necessary to conduct research that analyzes these structures and derives policy implications.The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural characteristics of sub-sectors within Korea's food processing industry and to derive policy implications.Specifically, the study collects data on firm concentration, total sales, and total exports by sub-sector, and examines changes over time as well as interrelationships among key variables.The results derived from the econometric model analysis are as follows.First, the trend analysis of firm concentration across sub-sectors indicates that concentration levels have declined in most sub-sectors, while the overall industry size has increased.This suggests that Korea's food processing sub-sectors are experiencing growth driven by the entry of new firms.Second, an econometric analysis was conducted to examine the correlation between industry concentration and total industry size (measured by sales).The results show that, in many sub-sectors, concentration levels and industry size tend to move in opposite directions.This provides more concrete evidence supporting the earlier observation.In conclusion, the growth structure of Korea's food manufacturing sub-sectors can be evaluated as generally positive.This is because a weakening of market concentration reduces social losses associated with the excess profits of monopolistic or oligopolistic firms.Therefore, the government should strengthen policies that promote greater competition within the sub-sectors of the food manufacturing industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.520312
Primary Topic
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural analysis of the food processing industry

Soung-Hun Kim, Gwangsik Oh
Korean Journal of Agricultural Science
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
article

Structural analysis of the food processing industry

Soung-Hun Kim, Gwangsik Oh
article en

Abstract

The food processing industry uses agricultural, livestock, and fishery products as raw materials to produce processed foods, serving as a major consumer of these products and a key contributor to their added value.Since 2008, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs has been fostering Korea's food manufacturing industry, which now has a market size of 83.1 trillion Korean won.The food processing industry is subdivided into various sectors according to product categories, with each sub-sector exhibiting distinct structural characteristics.While certain sub-sectors are marked by a high degree of oligopoly, others are characterized by a competitive market structure involving a large number of firms.Given that the structural differences among sub-sectors of the food processing industry are critical factors in the formulation of relevant policies, it is necessary to conduct research that analyzes these structures and derives policy implications.The purpose of this study is to analyze the structural characteristics of sub-sectors within Korea's food processing industry and to derive policy implications.Specifically, the study collects data on firm concentration, total sales, and total exports by sub-sector, and examines changes over time as well as interrelationships among key variables.The results derived from the econometric model analysis are as follows.First, the trend analysis of firm concentration across sub-sectors indicates that concentration levels have declined in most sub-sectors, while the overall industry size has increased.This suggests that Korea's food processing sub-sectors are experiencing growth driven by the entry of new firms.Second, an econometric analysis was conducted to examine the correlation between industry concentration and total industry size (measured by sales).The results show that, in many sub-sectors, concentration levels and industry size tend to move in opposite directions.This provides more concrete evidence supporting the earlier observation.In conclusion, the growth structure of Korea's food manufacturing sub-sectors can be evaluated as generally positive.This is because a weakening of market concentration reduces social losses associated with the excess profits of monopolistic or oligopolistic firms.Therefore, the government should strengthen policies that promote greater competition within the sub-sectors of the food manufacturing industry.

Korean Journal of Agricultural ScienceVol. 52(3)
Chungnam National University (KR)
Chungnam National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.