Constitution-Making Procedure and Legitimacy Maximisation: How Different Constitution-Making Procedures Satisfy Different Conceptions of Legitimacy

The various meanings of ‘legitimacy’ – Constitution-making procedure as a tool to achieve the right content of a new constitutional document – The effect of the procedure on the actual social and political context – Trade-offs between the various conceptions of legitimacy – Inherent tensions between transparency and political compromise, and between inclusivity and elite support – Direct democratic involvement aggravating polarisation – When the time is not ripe for constitution-making, recommended substitute strategies – Various procedural options: popular drafting, constituent assemblies, ordinary parliaments, expert bodies, roundtables, referenda – The dangers of (Kelsenian) constitutional revolutions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Constitutional Law Review
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019625100783
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitution-Making Procedure and Legitimacy Maximisation: How Different Constitution-Making Procedures Satisfy Different Conceptions of Legitimacy

András Jakab
European Constitutional Law Review
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Constitution-Making Procedure and Legitimacy Maximisation: How Different Constitution-Making Procedures Satisfy Different Conceptions of Legitimacy

András Jakab
article en

Abstract

The various meanings of ‘legitimacy’ – Constitution-making procedure as a tool to achieve the right content of a new constitutional document – The effect of the procedure on the actual social and political context – Trade-offs between the various conceptions of legitimacy – Inherent tensions between transparency and political compromise, and between inclusivity and elite support – Direct democratic involvement aggravating polarisation – When the time is not ripe for constitution-making, recommended substitute strategies – Various procedural options: popular drafting, constituent assemblies, ordinary parliaments, expert bodies, roundtables, referenda – The dangers of (Kelsenian) constitutional revolutions

European Constitutional Law ReviewVol. 21(3)
University of Salzburg (AT)
Universität Salzburg, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constitution-Making Procedure and Legitimacy Maximisation: How Different Constitution-Making Procedures Satisfy Different Conceptions of Legitimacy — András Jakab · European Constitutional Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS