A Literature Review: Bias Detection and Mitigation in Criminal Justice

The use of algorithmic models or systems in criminal justice is increasing day by day, yet the bias in these algorithms can perpetuate historical inequities, especially in predictive tools like COMPAS. This literature survey examines 30 studies addressing algorithmic bias in criminal justice. Key topics include bias types, bias detection metrics or variables such as demographic parity and equalized odds, and bias mitigation techniques like re-weighting and adversarial debiasing. Challenges in achieving fair and unbiased predictions are highlighted, including ethical considerations and trade-offs or a balance between fairness and accuracy. Insights from COMPAS and similar systems underscore the need for ongoing research, proposing potential directions for policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025107072
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Literature Review: Bias Detection and Mitigation in Criminal Justice

Arun Malik, C. S. A. Teddy Lesmana, Parminder Singh, Pravallika Kondapalli
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Literature Review: Bias Detection and Mitigation in Criminal Justice

Arun Malik, C. S. A. Teddy Lesmana, Parminder Singh, Pravallika Kondapalli
article en

Abstract

The use of algorithmic models or systems in criminal justice is increasing day by day, yet the bias in these algorithms can perpetuate historical inequities, especially in predictive tools like COMPAS. This literature survey examines 30 studies addressing algorithmic bias in criminal justice. Key topics include bias types, bias detection metrics or variables such as demographic parity and equalized odds, and bias mitigation techniques like re-weighting and adversarial debiasing. Challenges in achieving fair and unbiased predictions are highlighted, including ethical considerations and trade-offs or a balance between fairness and accuracy. Insights from COMPAS and similar systems underscore the need for ongoing research, proposing potential directions for policy and practice.

Lovely Professional University (IN), Universitas Wijaya Putra (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Literature Review: Bias Detection and Mitigation in Criminal Justice — Arun Malik, C. S. A. Teddy Lesmana, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS