Have New Plate Designs Reduced the Rate of Hardware Removal Following Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Fixation?

<b>Objectives</b>: Operative fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures has become increasingly the more acceptable choice of care in recent years, based on evidence supporting its effectiveness. However, this practice presents challenges due to the complex S-shaped morphology of the clavicle and its subcutaneous location. Despite the introduction of anatomically pre-contoured plates, achieving optimal implant-to-bone fit remains difficult, prompting the development of newer plate generations. The aim of this study was to compare the hardware removal rates of second-generation 2.7 mm thinner plates (SGPs) with those of first-generation 3.5 mm plates (FGPs). <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at a level one trauma center. A total of 187 patients received FGPs, and 67 received SGPs, both positioned on the superior bone surface. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons, and patients were followed for at least one year. Data were extracted from medical records and the PACS system. <b>Results</b>: The patients' demographics (age: 32.86 vs. 33.14 years; gender: 16.85% vs. 14.92% female) and fracture type (AO/OTA) were similar between the two groups. The rate of implant removal (20.1% vs. 20.9%) did not differ significantly between groups. Complications included nonunion (1.6% vs. 1.7%, statistically not significant) and infection (three cases in the FGP group, none in the SGP group). <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite the high success rate of clavicle fixation procedures, the superior clavicular plate removal rate remains significant, regardless of the implant design.