EP104 Effectiveness of leg elevation in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for cesarean sections due to its favorable profile; however, post-spinal hypotension (PSH) remains a frequent and dangerous hemodynamic complication. Despite numerous preventive approaches, the optimal non-pharmacological strategy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leg elevation (LE) versus no leg elevation (no LE) in reducing PSH in women undergoing elective cesarean section. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for randomized controlled trials comparing LE with no LE in elective cesarean sections. Studies reporting the incidence of PSH, vasopressor consumption, and heart rate changes were included. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, and heterogeneity was estimated via the Restricted Maximum Likelihood approach. <h3>Results</h3> A total of six RCTs comprising 505 patients were analyzed. LE significantly reduced the incidence of PSH (risk ratio: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51–0.79; p = 0.0001), equating to a 37% risk reduction. Additionally, the LE group demonstrated a significantly lower requirement for ephedrine (mean difference: -5.51 mg; 95% CI: -7.46 to -3.56; p &lt; 0.00001). In contrast, no significant difference in heart rate was observed between the groups (mean difference: 4.02; 95% CI: -11.40 to 19.44; p = 0.26). <h3>Conclusions</h3> In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, LE significantly reduced the risk of PSH and lowered ephedrine requirement, indicating it may be a simple, cost-effective, and non-invasive intervention for reducing the need for vasopressor support in elective cesarean sections. Further research is warranted to standardize LE protocols and confirm its applicability across diverse clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-esra.173
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP104 Effectiveness of leg elevation in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Umar Farooque, Audrey Bürki, Aaron Abouganem, Gaurav Kansal et al.
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

EP104 Effectiveness of leg elevation in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Umar Farooque, Audrey Bürki, Aaron Abouganem, Gaurav Kansal, Aastha Virendrasinh Mahida, Andela Malaj, Ahmedh Aaqil Rifky, Andres A Chuecos E
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Spinal anesthesia is the preferred technique for cesarean sections due to its favorable profile; however, post-spinal hypotension (PSH) remains a frequent and dangerous hemodynamic complication. Despite numerous preventive approaches, the optimal non-pharmacological strategy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of leg elevation (LE) versus no leg elevation (no LE) in reducing PSH in women undergoing elective cesarean section. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for randomized controlled trials comparing LE with no LE in elective cesarean sections. Studies reporting the incidence of PSH, vasopressor consumption, and heart rate changes were included. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, and heterogeneity was estimated via the Restricted Maximum Likelihood approach. <h3>Results</h3> A total of six RCTs comprising 505 patients were analyzed. LE significantly reduced the incidence of PSH (risk ratio: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51–0.79; p = 0.0001), equating to a 37% risk reduction. Additionally, the LE group demonstrated a significantly lower requirement for ephedrine (mean difference: -5.51 mg; 95% CI: -7.46 to -3.56; p &lt; 0.00001). In contrast, no significant difference in heart rate was observed between the groups (mean difference: 4.02; 95% CI: -11.40 to 19.44; p = 0.26). <h3>Conclusions</h3> In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, LE significantly reduced the risk of PSH and lowered ephedrine requirement, indicating it may be a simple, cost-effective, and non-invasive intervention for reducing the need for vasopressor support in elective cesarean sections. Further research is warranted to standardize LE protocols and confirm its applicability across diverse clinical settings.

Government Medical College (IN), Instituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud (PA), University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK), Universidad de Los Andes (VE), Luton and Dunstable Hospital (GB), Vivantes Klinikum (DE), David Tvildiani Medical University (GE), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.