OP54 Analgesic efficacy of serratus intercostal block versus epidural analgesia in open abdominal eventration: a randomised study

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Abdominal wall repair, including eventroplasty, is a frequent surgery in our operating theatres. These surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether serratus-intercostal block (SIPB) is equal or superior to epidural analgesia in terms of pain control and quality of postoperative recovery. <h3>Methods</h3> Following the approval of the ethical committee (no. 22-EO132 in September 2022) and registration (Trial registration number: NCT06014749), this prospective low-level intervention study of non-inferiority was initiated. The calculated sample size was determined to be n = 70, ensuring that a two-sided test with α = 0.05 would have 95% power to detect no difference in the proportion of patients. The NRS 3 was considered to be the difference. The inclusion criteria were abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. The two groups consisted of: SIPB (patients who received serratus-intercostal plane block) and epidural analgesia, both techniques associated with general anaesthesia. In the postoperative period, pain was assessed with specific forms using the NRS numeric rating scale and the quality of recovery with the modified QoR-15 scale. <h3>Results</h3> The statistics results show a no intraoperative fentanyl consumption difference between cohorts SIPB/Epi (243/214 µg) (p 0,37) and a postoperative morphine consumption of SIPB 0.36 mg + 0.88 and epidural 1.79 mg + 1.04 (p 0,01). In dynamic pain control NRS 6 (SIPB 0.7; epidural 3.2) (p 0,008), NRS12 (SIPB 2.2; epidural 4.4) (p 0,001), NRS24 (SIPB 2; epidural 4.3) (p &lt; 0,001). The adverse effects showed were (epidural: 5 catheters moved, 4 urine retention). Figure 1. The quality of recovery was better in SIPB group. Figure 2. <h3>Conclusions</h3> In summary, both techniques have shown adequate postoperative pain control, although SIPB has shown a superiority in the first 24 h, presenting this block as an alternative to epidural analgesia in eventroplasty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-esra.54
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP54 Analgesic efficacy of serratus intercostal block versus epidural analgesia in open abdominal eventration: a randomised study

María Fé Muñoz-Moreno, A. Fadrique Fuentes, R Gómez Rioja, J.A. Sainz et al.
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

OP54 Analgesic efficacy of serratus intercostal block versus epidural analgesia in open abdominal eventration: a randomised study

María Fé Muñoz-Moreno, A. Fadrique Fuentes, R Gómez Rioja, J.A. Sainz, María Teresa Rodríguez Fernández, J. Zurro, Ana Rubio
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Abdominal wall repair, including eventroplasty, is a frequent surgery in our operating theatres. These surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether serratus-intercostal block (SIPB) is equal or superior to epidural analgesia in terms of pain control and quality of postoperative recovery. <h3>Methods</h3> Following the approval of the ethical committee (no. 22-EO132 in September 2022) and registration (Trial registration number: NCT06014749), this prospective low-level intervention study of non-inferiority was initiated. The calculated sample size was determined to be n = 70, ensuring that a two-sided test with α = 0.05 would have 95% power to detect no difference in the proportion of patients. The NRS 3 was considered to be the difference. The inclusion criteria were abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. The two groups consisted of: SIPB (patients who received serratus-intercostal plane block) and epidural analgesia, both techniques associated with general anaesthesia. In the postoperative period, pain was assessed with specific forms using the NRS numeric rating scale and the quality of recovery with the modified QoR-15 scale. <h3>Results</h3> The statistics results show a no intraoperative fentanyl consumption difference between cohorts SIPB/Epi (243/214 µg) (p 0,37) and a postoperative morphine consumption of SIPB 0.36 mg + 0.88 and epidural 1.79 mg + 1.04 (p 0,01). In dynamic pain control NRS 6 (SIPB 0.7; epidural 3.2) (p 0,008), NRS12 (SIPB 2.2; epidural 4.4) (p 0,001), NRS24 (SIPB 2; epidural 4.3) (p &lt; 0,001). The adverse effects showed were (epidural: 5 catheters moved, 4 urine retention). Figure 1. The quality of recovery was better in SIPB group. Figure 2. <h3>Conclusions</h3> In summary, both techniques have shown adequate postoperative pain control, although SIPB has shown a superiority in the first 24 h, presenting this block as an alternative to epidural analgesia in eventroplasty.

Universidad de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Universitario de Burgos (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Universitario Río Hortega (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.