EP073 Comparison of success rate with short axis v/s long axis ultrasound-guided caudal block in children – a randomised controlled trial

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural, caudal block is commonly used for paediatric infra-umbilical surgeries under General Anaesthesia (GA), but the landmark technique is associated with many complications; hence, ultrasound-guided blocks are in vogue to overcome them. This study compares first-attempt success rates between short and long-axis ultrasound guided caudal blocks. <h3>Methods</h3> In this prospective randomized trial, 136 ASA I/II paediatric patients aged 0–6 years, undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries under GA, were randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (short-axis) and Group L (long-axis). The caudal blocks were given under USG guidance by an experienced provider in short and long axis to note the first attempt success rate, block performing time and any associated complications. <h3>Results</h3> Our study revealed that the first attempt success rate was comparable for Group S and Group L, with a p-value of 0.836. On comparing the two groups regarding the number of attempts for block (p=0.719), the mean time for performing the block (p=0.286), and associated complications (p=0.722), no statistically significant difference was found. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Ultrasound-guided caudal block with short axis v/s long axis has a comparable first-attempt success rate in children &lt; 6 years. The block performing time, and the associated complications are comparable as well in both the groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-esra.143
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP073 Comparison of success rate with short axis v/s long axis ultrasound-guided caudal block in children – a randomised controlled trial

Arvind Sinha, Kamlesh Kumari, Shilpa Goyal, Nikhil Kothari et al.
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

EP073 Comparison of success rate with short axis v/s long axis ultrasound-guided caudal block in children – a randomised controlled trial

Arvind Sinha, Kamlesh Kumari, Shilpa Goyal, Nikhil Kothari, Ankur Sharma, Shruti Gupta, Pradeep Bhatia
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Epidural, caudal block is commonly used for paediatric infra-umbilical surgeries under General Anaesthesia (GA), but the landmark technique is associated with many complications; hence, ultrasound-guided blocks are in vogue to overcome them. This study compares first-attempt success rates between short and long-axis ultrasound guided caudal blocks. <h3>Methods</h3> In this prospective randomized trial, 136 ASA I/II paediatric patients aged 0–6 years, undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries under GA, were randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (short-axis) and Group L (long-axis). The caudal blocks were given under USG guidance by an experienced provider in short and long axis to note the first attempt success rate, block performing time and any associated complications. <h3>Results</h3> Our study revealed that the first attempt success rate was comparable for Group S and Group L, with a p-value of 0.836. On comparing the two groups regarding the number of attempts for block (p=0.719), the mean time for performing the block (p=0.286), and associated complications (p=0.722), no statistically significant difference was found. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Ultrasound-guided caudal block with short axis v/s long axis has a comparable first-attempt success rate in children &lt; 6 years. The block performing time, and the associated complications are comparable as well in both the groups.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.