EP038 Comparative assessment of needle tip positioning for genicular nerve block using ultrasound guidance versus fluoroscopic landmarks in chronic knee osteoarthritis: an observational study

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Genicular nerve block (GNB) is performed using both fluoroscopy (FL) and ultrasound (USG) guided techniques. These techniques identify the targets using specific approaches. Our primary aim was to measure the difference in needle position between USG and FL guided techniques <h3>Methods</h3> We had recruited 48 patients. GNB was performed by experienced anaesthesiologist using echogenic needle under USG guidance. The conventional USG landmarks were the targets in superomedial (SM), superolateral (SL), and Inferomedial (IM) GNB. After injection, all needles were kept in situ. Then, both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were taken. Post-block pain scores were assessed at one hour, six hours, 24 hours, and one month. Later, the needles from fluoroscopic image were removed using software. The edited image was shown to anaesthesiologist and asked to mark the target for FL guided GNB. Both the original and edited images were superimposed and the distance between two points were measured. The first point was USG guided needle position and second point was the target point for fluoroscopy as marked. This was measured in SM, SL, and IM needle position. The second point was considered as acceptable if it was within 5 mm radius of the first point <h3>Results</h3> The average distance between two points in AP view was 3.9±2.6, 4.4±3.0 and 3.8±2.6 in SM, SL, and IM respectively. In the lateral view it was 6.2±3.0, 6.8±3.5 and 6.3±2.9 in SM, SL, and IM respectively. Mean NRS scores at baseline, 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 1-month were noted. Though only eight patients had acceptable needle position in both images, all 48 patients had a significant pain relief <h3>Conclusions</h3> Average distance between the between the needle tip of USG and FL guided GNB was 4.0±0.3 mm and 6.4±0.3 mm in AP and lateral images respectively

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-esra.110
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EP038 Comparative assessment of needle tip positioning for genicular nerve block using ultrasound guidance versus fluoroscopic landmarks in chronic knee osteoarthritis: an observational study

Manjari Kishore, Aswini Kuberan, Lenin Babu Elakkumanan
1 links
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

EP038 Comparative assessment of needle tip positioning for genicular nerve block using ultrasound guidance versus fluoroscopic landmarks in chronic knee osteoarthritis: an observational study

Manjari Kishore, Aswini Kuberan, Lenin Babu Elakkumanan
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background and Aims</h3> Genicular nerve block (GNB) is performed using both fluoroscopy (FL) and ultrasound (USG) guided techniques. These techniques identify the targets using specific approaches. Our primary aim was to measure the difference in needle position between USG and FL guided techniques <h3>Methods</h3> We had recruited 48 patients. GNB was performed by experienced anaesthesiologist using echogenic needle under USG guidance. The conventional USG landmarks were the targets in superomedial (SM), superolateral (SL), and Inferomedial (IM) GNB. After injection, all needles were kept in situ. Then, both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were taken. Post-block pain scores were assessed at one hour, six hours, 24 hours, and one month. Later, the needles from fluoroscopic image were removed using software. The edited image was shown to anaesthesiologist and asked to mark the target for FL guided GNB. Both the original and edited images were superimposed and the distance between two points were measured. The first point was USG guided needle position and second point was the target point for fluoroscopy as marked. This was measured in SM, SL, and IM needle position. The second point was considered as acceptable if it was within 5 mm radius of the first point <h3>Results</h3> The average distance between two points in AP view was 3.9±2.6, 4.4±3.0 and 3.8±2.6 in SM, SL, and IM respectively. In the lateral view it was 6.2±3.0, 6.8±3.5 and 6.3±2.9 in SM, SL, and IM respectively. Mean NRS scores at baseline, 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 1-month were noted. Though only eight patients had acceptable needle position in both images, all 48 patients had a significant pain relief <h3>Conclusions</h3> Average distance between the between the needle tip of USG and FL guided GNB was 4.0±0.3 mm and 6.4±0.3 mm in AP and lateral images respectively

ITPEnergised Group (India) (IN), Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.