Validation results of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (cade-q-sv) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire- Short Version (CADE‑Q‑SV) in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The Vietnamese CADE‑Q‑SV was tested on 50 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing their first PCI at Hanoi Heart Hospital. The process included four steps: 1) finalizing the questionnaire; 2) pilot testing; 3) assessing reliability via Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest stability; and 4) evaluating construct validity by correlating questionnaire scores with patient characteristics. Results: Among participants (n = 50), 72% were male and 28% female, with a mean age of 66.6 ± 12.9 years. There was no significant association between demographic characteristics and knowledge level (p > 0.05). However, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity were significantly correlated with patient knowledge (p < 0.05). The overall Cronbach’s alpha for the 20-item questionnaire was 0.792; all item-total correlations exceeded 0.300. Cronbach’s alpha for the medical/emotional domain was 0.695, and for the nutrition/physical domain, 0.714. All items demonstrated a Kappa coefficient ≥ 0.64 (p < 0.001) among post‑PCI patients. Conclusion: The Vietnamese version of the CADE‑Q‑SV is a valid and reliable tool for assessing educational needs in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tạp chí Phẫu thuật và Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt Nam
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47972/vjcts.v52i.1497
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation results of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (cade-q-sv) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Huy Hoang Ngo, Thi May Phan, Nhu Hung Pham
Tạp chí Phẫu thuật và Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt Nam
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Validation results of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (cade-q-sv) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention

Huy Hoang Ngo, Thi May Phan, Nhu Hung Pham
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire- Short Version (CADE‑Q‑SV) in patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: The Vietnamese CADE‑Q‑SV was tested on 50 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing their first PCI at Hanoi Heart Hospital. The process included four steps: 1) finalizing the questionnaire; 2) pilot testing; 3) assessing reliability via Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest stability; and 4) evaluating construct validity by correlating questionnaire scores with patient characteristics. Results: Among participants (n = 50), 72% were male and 28% female, with a mean age of 66.6 ± 12.9 years. There was no significant association between demographic characteristics and knowledge level (p > 0.05). However, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity were significantly correlated with patient knowledge (p < 0.05). The overall Cronbach’s alpha for the 20-item questionnaire was 0.792; all item-total correlations exceeded 0.300. Cronbach’s alpha for the medical/emotional domain was 0.695, and for the nutrition/physical domain, 0.714. All items demonstrated a Kappa coefficient ≥ 0.64 (p < 0.001) among post‑PCI patients. Conclusion: The Vietnamese version of the CADE‑Q‑SV is a valid and reliable tool for assessing educational needs in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Tạp chí Phẫu thuật và Tim mạch và Lồng ngực Việt NamVol. 52
University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street (GB), Nam Dinh University of Nursing (VN), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.