Integrating UAS Remote Sensing and Edge Detection for Accurate Coal Stockpile Volume Estimation

Accurate stockpile volume estimation is essential for industries that manage bulk materials across various stages of production. Conventional ground-based methods such as walking wheels, total stations, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), and Terrestrial Laser Scanners (TLSs) have been widely used, but often involve significant safety risks, particularly when accessing hard-to-reach or hazardous areas. Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) provide a safer and more efficient alternative for surveying irregularly shaped stockpiles. This study evaluates UAS-based methods for estimating the volume of coal stockpiles at a storage facility near Cadiz, Ohio. Two sensor platforms were deployed: a Freefly Alta X quadcopter equipped with a Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR, active sensor) and a WingtraOne UAS with Post-Processed Kinematic (PPK) multispectral imaging (optical, passive sensor). Three approaches were compared: (1) LiDAR; (2) Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry with a Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (SfM–DTM); and (3) an SfM-derived DSM combined with a kriging-interpolated DTM (SfM–intDTM). An automated boundary detection workflow was developed, integrating slope thresholding, Near-Infrared (NIR) spectral filtering, and Canny edge detection. Volume estimates from SfM–DTM and SfM–intDTM closely matched LiDAR-based reference estimates, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 147.51 m3 and 146.18 m3, respectively. The SfM–intDTM approach achieved a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of ~2%, indicating strong agreement with LiDAR and improved accuracy compared to prior studies. A sensitivity analysis further highlighted the role of spatial resolution in volume estimation. While RMSE values remained consistent (141–162 m3) and the MAPE below 2.5% for resolutions between 0.06 m and 5 m, accuracy declined at coarser resolutions, with the MAPE rising to 11.76% at 10 m. This emphasizes the need to balance the resolution with the study objectives, geographic extent, and computational costs when selecting elevation data for volume estimation. Overall, UAS-based SfM photogrammetry combined with interpolated DTMs and automated boundary extraction offers a scalable, cost-effective, and accurate approach for stockpile volume estimation. The methodology is well-suited for both the high-precision monitoring of individual stockpiles and broader regional-scale assessments and can be readily adapted to other domains such as quarrying, agricultural storage, and forestry operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183136
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating UAS Remote Sensing and Edge Detection for Accurate Coal Stockpile Volume Estimation

Sami Khanal, Ajay Shah, Sandeep Dhakal, Ashish Manandhar
Remote Sensing
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Integrating UAS Remote Sensing and Edge Detection for Accurate Coal Stockpile Volume Estimation

Sami Khanal, Ajay Shah, Sandeep Dhakal, Ashish Manandhar
article en

Abstract

Accurate stockpile volume estimation is essential for industries that manage bulk materials across various stages of production. Conventional ground-based methods such as walking wheels, total stations, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), and Terrestrial Laser Scanners (TLSs) have been widely used, but often involve significant safety risks, particularly when accessing hard-to-reach or hazardous areas. Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) provide a safer and more efficient alternative for surveying irregularly shaped stockpiles. This study evaluates UAS-based methods for estimating the volume of coal stockpiles at a storage facility near Cadiz, Ohio. Two sensor platforms were deployed: a Freefly Alta X quadcopter equipped with a Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR, active sensor) and a WingtraOne UAS with Post-Processed Kinematic (PPK) multispectral imaging (optical, passive sensor). Three approaches were compared: (1) LiDAR; (2) Structure-from-Motion (SfM) photogrammetry with a Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (SfM–DTM); and (3) an SfM-derived DSM combined with a kriging-interpolated DTM (SfM–intDTM). An automated boundary detection workflow was developed, integrating slope thresholding, Near-Infrared (NIR) spectral filtering, and Canny edge detection. Volume estimates from SfM–DTM and SfM–intDTM closely matched LiDAR-based reference estimates, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 147.51 m3 and 146.18 m3, respectively. The SfM–intDTM approach achieved a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of ~2%, indicating strong agreement with LiDAR and improved accuracy compared to prior studies. A sensitivity analysis further highlighted the role of spatial resolution in volume estimation. While RMSE values remained consistent (141–162 m3) and the MAPE below 2.5% for resolutions between 0.06 m and 5 m, accuracy declined at coarser resolutions, with the MAPE rising to 11.76% at 10 m. This emphasizes the need to balance the resolution with the study objectives, geographic extent, and computational costs when selecting elevation data for volume estimation. Overall, UAS-based SfM photogrammetry combined with interpolated DTMs and automated boundary extraction offers a scalable, cost-effective, and accurate approach for stockpile volume estimation. The methodology is well-suited for both the high-precision monitoring of individual stockpiles and broader regional-scale assessments and can be readily adapted to other domains such as quarrying, agricultural storage, and forestry operations.

Remote SensingVol. 17(18)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.