Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using In Situ Needle Triple Fenestration and Selective Cerebral Perfusion: Single-Center Results

<b>Background:</b> Advances in stent grafts and endovascular techniques have expanded the indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to include arch lesions. In situ needle fenestration (ISNF) has emerged as a promising technique for revascularizing supra-aortic branches. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple in situ needle fenestration during TEVAR for aortic arch pathologies in a single-center experience. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on fifteen patients who underwent in situ triple fenestration TEVAR between June 2023 and March 2024. The median age of the patients was 51,33 years (±19.69) and twelve of the patients were male. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia in a hybrid operating room. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and informed consent was received from all participants. <b>Results:</b> Primary technical success was achieved in all cases (15/15, 100%). The mean operation time was 197.33 min (range: 126-302). Two patients experienced a minor hematoma at the access site. Mortality was observed in one patient (6.66%) during the 30-day follow-up period. The total hospital stay averaged 7 ± 3.36 days. One patient had a transient ischemic attack, but there were no incidents of stroke or spinal cord ischemia. No procedure-related endoleak was observed during the intervention; however, eight patients required reintervention in the descending aorta. <b>Conclusions:</b> ISNF may be an effective and feasible method for revascularizing arch vessels, with low rates of early mortality and stroke when performed by experienced practitioners. However, larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the durability and long-term outcomes of this technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186377
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using In Situ Needle Triple Fenestration and Selective Cerebral Perfusion: Single-Center Results

Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Nur Dikmen, Levent Yazıcıoğlu, Ali İhsan Hasde et al.
2 links
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using In Situ Needle Triple Fenestration and Selective Cerebral Perfusion: Single-Center Results

Mehmet Cahit Sarıcaoğlu, Nur Dikmen, Levent Yazıcıoğlu, Ali İhsan Hasde, F. Akca, Melisa Kandemir, Evren Özçınar, Onur Büyükçakır, Salih Anıl Boğa, Oğuzhan Durmaz, Ayşegül Güven, Ali Fuat Karaçuha, Sadık Eryilmaz
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Advances in stent grafts and endovascular techniques have expanded the indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to include arch lesions. In situ needle fenestration (ISNF) has emerged as a promising technique for revascularizing supra-aortic branches. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple in situ needle fenestration during TEVAR for aortic arch pathologies in a single-center experience. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on fifteen patients who underwent in situ triple fenestration TEVAR between June 2023 and March 2024. The median age of the patients was 51,33 years (±19.69) and twelve of the patients were male. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia in a hybrid operating room. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and informed consent was received from all participants. <b>Results:</b> Primary technical success was achieved in all cases (15/15, 100%). The mean operation time was 197.33 min (range: 126-302). Two patients experienced a minor hematoma at the access site. Mortality was observed in one patient (6.66%) during the 30-day follow-up period. The total hospital stay averaged 7 ± 3.36 days. One patient had a transient ischemic attack, but there were no incidents of stroke or spinal cord ischemia. No procedure-related endoleak was observed during the intervention; however, eight patients required reintervention in the descending aorta. <b>Conclusions:</b> ISNF may be an effective and feasible method for revascularizing arch vessels, with low rates of early mortality and stroke when performed by experienced practitioners. However, larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the durability and long-term outcomes of this technique.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Ankara University (TR), Uni Research (Norway) (NO), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), Kırıkkale University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.