Pareto Front Optimization for Spiral-Grooved High-Speed Thrust Bearings: Comparison Between Analytical and Numerical Models

This paper compares two multi-objective optimization strategies for spiral-grooved dynamic gas thrust bearings. The first optimization is carried out using an analytical model, which is valid under the assumption of a high number of grooves. The second one is carried out by using a numerical model based on a finite difference (FD) technique, which is valid also in case of a limited number of grooves. The FD model was validated with data from the literature, then it was compared with the analytical model. The multi-objective optimization is based on a genetic algorithm and it is aimed at maximizing the load-carrying capacity (LCC) of the thrust bearing while minimizing its friction torque. It was found that the analytical model overestimates both the friction torque and the load capacity compared to the FD model, and that the Pareto front optimizations reveal almost identical trends in the optimized parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13090832
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pareto Front Optimization for Spiral-Grooved High-Speed Thrust Bearings: Comparison Between Analytical and Numerical Models

Federico Colombo, Luigi Lentini, Edoardo Goti
1 citations
Machines
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
0.71
article

Pareto Front Optimization for Spiral-Grooved High-Speed Thrust Bearings: Comparison Between Analytical and Numerical Models

Federico Colombo, Luigi Lentini, Edoardo Goti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper compares two multi-objective optimization strategies for spiral-grooved dynamic gas thrust bearings. The first optimization is carried out using an analytical model, which is valid under the assumption of a high number of grooves. The second one is carried out by using a numerical model based on a finite difference (FD) technique, which is valid also in case of a limited number of grooves. The FD model was validated with data from the literature, then it was compared with the analytical model. The multi-objective optimization is based on a genetic algorithm and it is aimed at maximizing the load-carrying capacity (LCC) of the thrust bearing while minimizing its friction torque. It was found that the analytical model overestimates both the friction torque and the load capacity compared to the FD model, and that the Pareto front optimizations reveal almost identical trends in the optimized parameters.

MachinesVol. 13(9)
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.