COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ACCELERATED REHABILITATION AND ECCENTRIC STRENGTHENING EXERCISES IN PATIENTS WITH ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a degenerative condition of the tendon characterized by pain, swelling, and functional impairment, particularly among active individuals. It commonly affects the Achilles tendon, which connects the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles to the calcaneus. With prevalence rates reaching up to 18% in runners and athletes, its management remains a clinical challenge. Traditional approaches focus on eccentric strengthening, while newer accelerated rehabilitation programs emphasize progressive loading, yet evidence comparing their relative efficacy is limited. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an accelerated rehabilitation protocol and eccentric strengthening exercises in reducing pain and improving quality of life among patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 34 patients clinically diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A received an accelerated rehabilitation protocol, while Group B underwent eccentric strengthening exercises. Both interventions were delivered over 12 weeks, following standardized baseline therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline and after intervention. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: At baseline, both groups reported comparable pain levels (Pre-NPRS median 9.00, U = 144.5, p = 1.000, r = 0.000). Post-treatment, Group B achieved greater improvements, with NPRS significantly reduced to a median of 2.00 compared to 6.00 in Group A (U = 0.000, p < 0.001, r = 0.868). Quality of life scores also improved more in Group B, rising from a median of 67.00 to 82.00, compared to Group A’s increase from 53.00 to 61.00 (U = 0.000, p < 0.001, r = 0.859). Conclusion: Both interventions were effective, but eccentric strengthening produced superior reductions in pain and greater improvements in quality of life compared to accelerated rehabilitation. These findings support the preferential use of eccentric exercises as a primary treatment for Achilles tendinopathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/jsvq0y17
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ACCELERATED REHABILITATION AND ECCENTRIC STRENGTHENING EXERCISES IN PATIENTS WITH ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY

Sahar Aslam, Nawal Fatima, Ayesha Siddiqua
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ACCELERATED REHABILITATION AND ECCENTRIC STRENGTHENING EXERCISES IN PATIENTS WITH ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY

Sahar Aslam, Nawal Fatima, Ayesha Siddiqua
article en

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a degenerative condition of the tendon characterized by pain, swelling, and functional impairment, particularly among active individuals. It commonly affects the Achilles tendon, which connects the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles to the calcaneus. With prevalence rates reaching up to 18% in runners and athletes, its management remains a clinical challenge. Traditional approaches focus on eccentric strengthening, while newer accelerated rehabilitation programs emphasize progressive loading, yet evidence comparing their relative efficacy is limited. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of an accelerated rehabilitation protocol and eccentric strengthening exercises in reducing pain and improving quality of life among patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 34 patients clinically diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A received an accelerated rehabilitation protocol, while Group B underwent eccentric strengthening exercises. Both interventions were delivered over 12 weeks, following standardized baseline therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline and after intervention. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: At baseline, both groups reported comparable pain levels (Pre-NPRS median 9.00, U = 144.5, p = 1.000, r = 0.000). Post-treatment, Group B achieved greater improvements, with NPRS significantly reduced to a median of 2.00 compared to 6.00 in Group A (U = 0.000, p < 0.001, r = 0.868). Quality of life scores also improved more in Group B, rising from a median of 67.00 to 82.00, compared to Group A’s increase from 53.00 to 61.00 (U = 0.000, p < 0.001, r = 0.859). Conclusion: Both interventions were effective, but eccentric strengthening produced superior reductions in pain and greater improvements in quality of life compared to accelerated rehabilitation. These findings support the preferential use of eccentric exercises as a primary treatment for Achilles tendinopathy.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(5 (Health and Allied))
Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.