Endogenous, yet Exotic, Sulfur in the Lunar Mantle

Abstract In situ sulfur isotope analyses of sulfides found in regolith particles from the recently opened Apollo 17 drive tube 73001/2 reveal variable 34 S/ 32 S and 33 S/ 32 S that range from that of typical lunar basalts to strongly 34 S‐ and 33 S‐depleted values (δ 34 S = −4.1 ± 0.35 to +1.5 ± 0.029; Δ 33 S = −2.8 ± 0.48 to −0.1 ± 0.27 (2σ)). All Δ 33 S and δ 34 S data are positively correlated. The correlation indicates mixing between at least two distinct sources of sulfur in the lunar mantle, one of which is associated with photochemically processed sulfur from a gaseous environment (strongly negative Δ 33 S). The gaseous precursor and its preservation in endogenous sulfides require that either the sulfur was delivered to the lunar mantle early in its history through unknown processes or it is a remnant of the giant Moon‐forming impactor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008834
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endogenous, yet Exotic, Sulfur in the Lunar Mantle

Brian Monteleone, S. B. Simon, James Dottin, Hairuo Fu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Astro and Planetary Science
1.15
article

Endogenous, yet Exotic, Sulfur in the Lunar Mantle

Brian Monteleone, S. B. Simon, James Dottin, Hairuo Fu, C. K. Shearer, J. S. Boesenberg, J. Benson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In situ sulfur isotope analyses of sulfides found in regolith particles from the recently opened Apollo 17 drive tube 73001/2 reveal variable 34 S/ 32 S and 33 S/ 32 S that range from that of typical lunar basalts to strongly 34 S‐ and 33 S‐depleted values (δ 34 S = −4.1 ± 0.35 to +1.5 ± 0.029; Δ 33 S = −2.8 ± 0.48 to −0.1 ± 0.27 (2σ)). All Δ 33 S and δ 34 S data are positively correlated. The correlation indicates mixing between at least two distinct sources of sulfur in the lunar mantle, one of which is associated with photochemically processed sulfur from a gaseous environment (strongly negative Δ 33 S). The gaseous precursor and its preservation in endogenous sulfides require that either the sulfur was delivered to the lunar mantle early in its history through unknown processes or it is a remnant of the giant Moon‐forming impactor.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(9)
University of New Mexico (US), Brown University (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Astro and Planetary Science
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.