Data-Driven Fault Prediction for Electric Submersible Progressing Cavity Pump Wells

During the development of coalbed methane (CBM), electric submersible progressing cavity pumps (ESPCPs) face challenges such as handling gas–liquid mixtures, high water content, declining pump efficiency, and frequent failures. This study proposes a data-driven fault prediction and diagnostic method, analyzing various factors affecting pump performance, such as gas–liquid ratio, water content of extracted fluids, pumping depth, and current fluctuations, to explore their correlation with pump failures. The dataset used in this study was collected from 85 ESPCP wells in the Northern Zhachi Oilfield between January 2019 and December 2022, with daily acquisition of key operational parameters including tubing pressure, pump current, vibration, temperature, produced liquid rate, and gas–liquid ratio. Baseline models including ARIMA and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) were trained for performance comparison, with the proposed PCA–LSTM model achieving a 15% and 9% improvement in validation accuracy over ARIMA and GBDT, respectively. Model performance is quantitatively reported: acceptance rate 86.79% and validation accuracy 72.22%. The results indicate that the PCA–LSTM model can effectively identify and predict ESPCP failure types, providing vital technical support for the efficient operation and maintenance of CBM wells, and its practical applicability has been well recognized by field engineers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092890
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Driven Fault Prediction for Electric Submersible Progressing Cavity Pump Wells

Bin Liu, Chunsheng Wu, Liping Zhao, Guoqing Han et al.
1 citations
Processes
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
1.15
article

Data-Driven Fault Prediction for Electric Submersible Progressing Cavity Pump Wells

Bin Liu, Chunsheng Wu, Liping Zhao, Guoqing Han, Zezhou Li, Bin Fan, Jingen Deng, Cong Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During the development of coalbed methane (CBM), electric submersible progressing cavity pumps (ESPCPs) face challenges such as handling gas–liquid mixtures, high water content, declining pump efficiency, and frequent failures. This study proposes a data-driven fault prediction and diagnostic method, analyzing various factors affecting pump performance, such as gas–liquid ratio, water content of extracted fluids, pumping depth, and current fluctuations, to explore their correlation with pump failures. The dataset used in this study was collected from 85 ESPCP wells in the Northern Zhachi Oilfield between January 2019 and December 2022, with daily acquisition of key operational parameters including tubing pressure, pump current, vibration, temperature, produced liquid rate, and gas–liquid ratio. Baseline models including ARIMA and Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) were trained for performance comparison, with the proposed PCA–LSTM model achieving a 15% and 9% improvement in validation accuracy over ARIMA and GBDT, respectively. Model performance is quantitatively reported: acceptance rate 86.79% and validation accuracy 72.22%. The results indicate that the PCA–LSTM model can effectively identify and predict ESPCP failure types, providing vital technical support for the efficient operation and maintenance of CBM wells, and its practical applicability has been well recognized by field engineers.

ProcessesVol. 13(9)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing, PetroChina Company Limited
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.