International Legal Implications of the North Natuna Maritime Dispute: A Review of Indonesia–China Tensions in the Past Two Years

The dispute in the North Natuna Sea between Indonesia and China has emerged as one of the most prominent public international law issues in the past two years. China’s unilateral claim through the nine-dash line contradicts the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which both countries have ratified. Indonesia consistently rejects the claim, asserting its sovereign rights over its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This article analyzes the recent tensions, including maritime incursions, diplomatic responses, and the implications for regional stability and Indonesia’s position in international law. Using a normative legal method and a case study approach, the study finds that while UNCLOS provides a strong legal foundation for Indonesia, the lack of effective enforcement mechanisms in international law poses a major challenge to resolving the dispute.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i9-10
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Legal Implications of the North Natuna Maritime Dispute: A Review of Indonesia–China Tensions in the Past Two Years

Agustin Nafilla
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
International Maritime Law Issues
article

International Legal Implications of the North Natuna Maritime Dispute: A Review of Indonesia–China Tensions in the Past Two Years

Agustin Nafilla
article en

Abstract

The dispute in the North Natuna Sea between Indonesia and China has emerged as one of the most prominent public international law issues in the past two years. China’s unilateral claim through the nine-dash line contradicts the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which both countries have ratified. Indonesia consistently rejects the claim, asserting its sovereign rights over its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This article analyzes the recent tensions, including maritime incursions, diplomatic responses, and the implications for regional stability and Indonesia’s position in international law. Using a normative legal method and a case study approach, the study finds that while UNCLOS provides a strong legal foundation for Indonesia, the lack of effective enforcement mechanisms in international law poses a major challenge to resolving the dispute.

International Journal of Social Science and Human ResearchVol. 08(09)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.