Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis

Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0-1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18184244
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis

С. A. Чесноков, V. V. Yudin, Daria D. Linkova, Andrey Bokov et al.
Materials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis

С. A. Чесноков, V. V. Yudin, Daria D. Linkova, Andrey Bokov, Ekaterina A. Farafontova, И. А. Кирилова, D. Ya. Aleinik, L. A. Cherdantseva, Roman S. Kovylin, Marfa N. Egorikhina, D. V. Khramova, Ekaterina A. Levicheva
article en

Abstract

Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0-1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product.

MaterialsVol. 18(18)
Privolzhsky Research Medical University (RU), G.A. Razuvaev Institute of Organometallic Chemistry (RU), Novosibirsk Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics. Ya.L. Tsivyan (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.