Brokering Knowledge With Tempered Criticality: A Network Analysis of Amici in DACA Policy Discourse

Research can be brokered to the courts to accurately contextualize policy issues and identify transformative solutions that counter inequity. Using a critical lens, we studied this phenomenon, examining the networks that amici formed as they brokered knowledge in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) case before the Supreme Court. We analyzed four bipartite networks across different dimensions of the research amici used (i.e., venue types, methodologies, authors, and arguments). Our findings suggest that in brokering knowledge, amici exhibited what we term “tempered criticality” rather than seeking to influence broader transformational change. Yet, it is important to recognize that their behavior is informed by their embedded context and the limitations of the legal system in creating systemic change. We discuss implications for research and policy.